You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Claude Warren <cl...@xenei.com> on 2014/06/02 18:24:21 UTC
Configuration implementation
I have an implementation of Apache Configuration [1] that sites on top of a
Resource.
This allows simple java access to configuration options specified in RDF
documents.
I was thinking of contributing it to the com.hp.hpl.jena.util package.
Does anyone object?
Claude
[1]
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/apidocs/index.html
--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
Re: Configuration implementation
Posted by Claude Warren <cl...@xenei.com>.
I think it will work with an assembler. I'll fire up a jena-commons
(things that make jena useful outside of standard stuff) as opposed to
jena-utils (which sounds like things that are used across jena modules)
Claude
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 02/06/14 17:24, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> I have an implementation of Apache Configuration [1] that sites on top of
>> a
>> Resource.
>>
>> This allows simple java access to configuration options specified in RDF
>> documents.
>>
>> I was thinking of contributing it to the com.hp.hpl.jena.util package.
>>
>> Does anyone object?
>>
>
> Not me.
>
> Would
>
> org.apache.jena.util.
>
> be better as we attempt to move away from com.hp? chh.jena.util is mainly
> internal stuff.
>
> Actually, this feel like a new module "jena-utils" "jena-commons" or
> whatever but I don't whatelse would go in it at the moment.
>
> I don't suppose this works with assemblers?
>
> If there were an assembler that created a org.apache.commons.configuration.Configuration,
> it would be useful to have.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>> Claude
>>
>> [1]
>> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/apidocs/index.html
>>
>>
>
>
--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
Re: Configuration implementation
Posted by Claude Warren <cl...@xenei.com>.
A quick followup.
It can read assembler files. Probably update them too.
Given that the module will be jena-commons should the base package be
org.apache.jena.commons rather than org.apache.jena.utils? I make this
suggestion with the thought that chh.jena.util may become
org.apache.jena.util during rewrite for Jena 3.
Thoughts?
Claude
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 02/06/14 17:24, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> I have an implementation of Apache Configuration [1] that sites on top of
>> a
>> Resource.
>>
>> This allows simple java access to configuration options specified in RDF
>> documents.
>>
>> I was thinking of contributing it to the com.hp.hpl.jena.util package.
>>
>> Does anyone object?
>>
>
> Not me.
>
> Would
>
> org.apache.jena.util.
>
> be better as we attempt to move away from com.hp? chh.jena.util is mainly
> internal stuff.
>
> Actually, this feel like a new module "jena-utils" "jena-commons" or
> whatever but I don't whatelse would go in it at the moment.
>
> I don't suppose this works with assemblers?
>
> If there were an assembler that created a org.apache.commons.configuration.Configuration,
> it would be useful to have.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>> Claude
>>
>> [1]
>> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/apidocs/index.html
>>
>>
>
>
--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
Re: Configuration implementation
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 02/06/14 17:24, Claude Warren wrote:
> I have an implementation of Apache Configuration [1] that sites on top of a
> Resource.
>
> This allows simple java access to configuration options specified in RDF
> documents.
>
> I was thinking of contributing it to the com.hp.hpl.jena.util package.
>
> Does anyone object?
Not me.
Would
org.apache.jena.util.
be better as we attempt to move away from com.hp? chh.jena.util is
mainly internal stuff.
Actually, this feel like a new module "jena-utils" "jena-commons" or
whatever but I don't whatelse would go in it at the moment.
I don't suppose this works with assemblers?
If there were an assembler that created a
org.apache.commons.configuration.Configuration, it would be useful to have.
Andy
>
> Claude
>
> [1]
> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/apidocs/index.html
>