You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ripple.apache.org by "Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH)" <pa...@microsoft.com> on 2015/02/18 01:23:25 UTC
[VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Hi,
I wanted to see if we can start a VOTE thread for making the first official ripple release. All the required LICENSE, NOTICE and headers have been updated. Please +1 if you think we should make a release.
P.S: I am not a member of the Ripple PMC, so not sure if I can start the vote. Once the vote passes, we would also need someone in the PMC to upload package.
RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Posted by "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" <Ro...@microsoft.com>.
You most certainly can +1, assuming you have actually checked the release is valid from an IP perspective.
What we need is three +1 "binding" votes, in reality that means three IPMC members. Once a project graduates it means three project management committee members. However, as a mentor (therefore having a binding vote) I look to the project participants to indicate their preference and (assuming now blocking issues on an IP check) I'll always vote in support of the communities non-binding votes.
In other words, all opinions are important and helpful.
Ross
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcamden@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:52 PM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Can I +1? Cuz - I am.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Dan Silivestru <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Does my vote even count any more? ;-)
> ᐧ
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gord Tanner <gt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Brent Lintner
>> <br...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey Parashuram,
>> >
>> > + 1 from me!
>> >
>> > No worries on the starting of the [Vote] thread. You are
>> > unofficially a member, I just need to do my duty and email out to
>> > the IPMC and figure
>> out
>> > how to add you to Git (along with SVN). :-(
>> >
>> > On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 19:23:56 Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) <
>> > panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I wanted to see if we can start a VOTE thread for making the
>> > > first official ripple release. All the required LICENSE, NOTICE
>> > > and headers
>> > have
>> > > been updated. Please +1 if you think we should make a release.
>> > >
>> > > P.S: I am not a member of the Ripple PMC, so not sure if I can
>> > > start
>> the
>> > > vote. Once the vote passes, we would also need someone in the PMC
>> > > to
>> > upload
>> > > package.
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Silivestru
> +1 (519) 589-3624
--
===========================================================================
Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
Twitter: raymondcamden
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Posted by Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com>.
Can I +1? Cuz - I am.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Dan Silivestru
<da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Does my vote even count any more? ;-)
> ᐧ
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gord Tanner <gt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey Parashuram,
>> >
>> > + 1 from me!
>> >
>> > No worries on the starting of the [Vote] thread. You are unofficially a
>> > member, I just need to do my duty and email out to the IPMC and figure
>> out
>> > how to add you to Git (along with SVN). :-(
>> >
>> > On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 19:23:56 Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) <
>> > panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I wanted to see if we can start a VOTE thread for making the first
>> > > official ripple release. All the required LICENSE, NOTICE and headers
>> > have
>> > > been updated. Please +1 if you think we should make a release.
>> > >
>> > > P.S: I am not a member of the Ripple PMC, so not sure if I can start
>> the
>> > > vote. Once the vote passes, we would also need someone in the PMC to
>> > upload
>> > > package.
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Silivestru
> +1 (519) 589-3624
--
===========================================================================
Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
Twitter: raymondcamden
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Posted by Dan Silivestru <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
Does my vote even count any more? ;-)
ᐧ
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gord Tanner <gt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Parashuram,
> >
> > + 1 from me!
> >
> > No worries on the starting of the [Vote] thread. You are unofficially a
> > member, I just need to do my duty and email out to the IPMC and figure
> out
> > how to add you to Git (along with SVN). :-(
> >
> > On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 19:23:56 Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) <
> > panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I wanted to see if we can start a VOTE thread for making the first
> > > official ripple release. All the required LICENSE, NOTICE and headers
> > have
> > > been updated. Please +1 if you think we should make a release.
> > >
> > > P.S: I am not a member of the Ripple PMC, so not sure if I can start
> the
> > > vote. Once the vote passes, we would also need someone in the PMC to
> > upload
> > > package.
> > >
> >
>
--
Dan Silivestru
+1 (519) 589-3624
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Posted by Gord Tanner <gt...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey Parashuram,
>
> + 1 from me!
>
> No worries on the starting of the [Vote] thread. You are unofficially a
> member, I just need to do my duty and email out to the IPMC and figure out
> how to add you to Git (along with SVN). :-(
>
> On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 19:23:56 Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) <
> panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wanted to see if we can start a VOTE thread for making the first
> > official ripple release. All the required LICENSE, NOTICE and headers
> have
> > been updated. Please +1 if you think we should make a release.
> >
> > P.S: I am not a member of the Ripple PMC, so not sure if I can start the
> > vote. Once the vote passes, we would also need someone in the PMC to
> upload
> > package.
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Posted by Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>.
Hey Parashuram,
+ 1 from me!
No worries on the starting of the [Vote] thread. You are unofficially a
member, I just need to do my duty and email out to the IPMC and figure out
how to add you to Git (along with SVN). :-(
On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 19:23:56 Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) <
panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to see if we can start a VOTE thread for making the first
> official ripple release. All the required LICENSE, NOTICE and headers have
> been updated. Please +1 if you think we should make a release.
>
> P.S: I am not a member of the Ripple PMC, so not sure if I can start the
> vote. Once the vote passes, we would also need someone in the PMC to upload
> package.
>
RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Posted by Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>.
Thanks Ross, I believe I have correctly verified everything listed below when creating the package. So the next step is for others to download the package themselves and confirm it is compliant, then vote accordingly?
The package can be found here: http://bit.ly/1FZ8meZ (this is shared from my OneDrive account - please let me know if there is a more "official" place I should be putting this for people to access).
Thanks,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 7:19 AM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Voting on releases is one of the few things that the ASF requires formal policies to be followed. The reason boils down to ensuring that the foundation can protect developers in the event of a legal dispute resulting from a release. It is critical that we follow the processes as defined, which include actually verifying the release is valid before voting.
A vote thread needs to have the essential information within it to enable to community to evaluate and vote. Nobody should vote unless they have performed the necessary checks on the artifacts. Where are the artifacts we are voting on? They need to be referenced in this email thread to provide a traceable reference.
Note that the minimum level of checks before voting +1 are:
1.1 Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
See the Release Signing dev documentation.
2.1 Build is successful including automated tests.
The expanded source archive is expected to build and pass tests.
3.1 DISCLAIMER is correct, filenames include "incubating".
See the Podling Branding Guide.
3.2 Top-level LICENSE and NOTICE are correct for each distribution.
See the Licensing How-To, plus various pages under Legal Affairs.
3.3 All source files have license headers where appropriate.
See the ASF Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy.
3.4 The provenance of all source files is clear (ASF or software grants).
See the IP clearance section of the Mentor's guide, as well as the Releases section of the Incubator's policy page.
3.5 Dependencies licenses are ok as per http://apache.org/legal/
See ASF Legal Previously Asked Questions.
3.6 Release consists of source code only, no binaries.
Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may not contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled components are not open source, even if they were built from open source.
See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html for more information,
-----Original Message-----
From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panarasi@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:23 PM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Hi,
I wanted to see if we can start a VOTE thread for making the first official ripple release. All the required LICENSE, NOTICE and headers have been updated. Please +1 if you think we should make a release.
P.S: I am not a member of the Ripple PMC, so not sure if I can start the vote. Once the vote passes, we would also need someone in the PMC to upload package.
RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Posted by "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" <Ro...@microsoft.com>.
Voting on releases is one of the few things that the ASF requires formal policies to be followed. The reason boils down to ensuring that the foundation can protect developers in the event of a legal dispute resulting from a release. It is critical that we follow the processes as defined, which include actually verifying the release is valid before voting.
A vote thread needs to have the essential information within it to enable to community to evaluate and vote. Nobody should vote unless they have performed the necessary checks on the artifacts. Where are the artifacts we are voting on? They need to be referenced in this email thread to provide a traceable reference.
Note that the minimum level of checks before voting +1 are:
1.1 Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
See the Release Signing dev documentation.
2.1 Build is successful including automated tests.
The expanded source archive is expected to build and pass tests.
3.1 DISCLAIMER is correct, filenames include "incubating".
See the Podling Branding Guide.
3.2 Top-level LICENSE and NOTICE are correct for each distribution.
See the Licensing How-To, plus various pages under Legal Affairs.
3.3 All source files have license headers where appropriate.
See the ASF Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy.
3.4 The provenance of all source files is clear (ASF or software grants).
See the IP clearance section of the Mentor's guide, as well as the Releases section of the Incubator's policy page.
3.5 Dependencies licenses are ok as per http://apache.org/legal/
See ASF Legal Previously Asked Questions.
3.6 Release consists of source code only, no binaries.
Each Apache release must contain a source package. This package may not contain compiled components (such as "jar" files) because compiled components are not open source, even if they were built from open source.
See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html for more information,
-----Original Message-----
From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panarasi@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:23 PM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.26
Hi,
I wanted to see if we can start a VOTE thread for making the first official ripple release. All the required LICENSE, NOTICE and headers have been updated. Please +1 if you think we should make a release.
P.S: I am not a member of the Ripple PMC, so not sure if I can start the vote. Once the vote passes, we would also need someone in the PMC to upload package.