You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Roman Khachatryan (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/05/27 15:36:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (FLINK-17820) Memory threshold is ignored for
channel state
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Roman Khachatryan resolved FLINK-17820.
---------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Memory threshold is ignored for channel state
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-17820
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17820
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Runtime / Checkpointing, Runtime / Task
> Affects Versions: 1.11.0
> Reporter: Roman Khachatryan
> Assignee: Roman Khachatryan
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> Config parameter state.backend.fs.memory-threshold is ignored for channel state. Causing each subtask to have a file per checkpoint. Regardless of the size of channel state (of this subtask).
> This also causes slow cleanup and delays the next checkpoint.
>
> The problem is that {{ChannelStateCheckpointWriter.finishWriteAndResult}} calls flush(); which actually flushes the data on disk.
>
> From FSDataOutputStream.flush Javadoc:
> A completed flush does not mean that the data is necessarily persistent. Data persistence can is only assumed after calls to close() or sync().
>
> Possible solutions:
> 1. not to flush in {{ChannelStateCheckpointWriter.finishWriteAndResult (which can lead to data loss in a wrapping stream).}}
> {{2. change }}{{FsCheckpointStateOutputStream.flush behavior}}
> {{3. wrap }}{{FsCheckpointStateOutputStream to prevent flush}}{{}}{{}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)