Re: [CForms] Binding and Namespaces

[Gianugo Rabellino <gi...@apache.org>]

On Sep 2, 2004, at 5:43 PM, Marc Portier wrote:
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>> Marc Portier wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>>>
>>>> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If I'm binding an XML document to a form, is it possible to use 
>>>>> namespaces in the binding? (The bound data has namespaces)

After a very long hiatus (didn't know what swamped really meant until 
the last three months) I finally found the time to integrate into the 
current codebase the work Marc (mainly) and I did at the Gettogether. 
The changes I have on my hard disk (only on BRANCH_2.1.X, but they 
should work on trunk as well) support an almost complete support for 
namespaced XML binding. However, I'm a bit uncomfortable in committing 
it right away since they touch an area where I have limited knowledge 
of possible side effects. Would you rather have me commit the whole 
thing right away or rather submit a patch in Bugzilla?

Ciao,
-- 
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. -  http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com

Re: [CForms] Binding and Namespaces

[Marc Portier <mp...@outerthought.org>]

Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2004, at 5:43 PM, Marc Portier wrote:
> 
>> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>>
>>> Marc Portier wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If I'm binding an XML document to a form, is it possible to use 
>>>>>> namespaces in the binding? (The bound data has namespaces)
> 
> 
> After a very long hiatus (didn't know what swamped really meant until 
> the last three months) I finally found the time to integrate into the 
> current codebase the work Marc (mainly) and I did at the Gettogether. 
> The changes I have on my hard disk (only on BRANCH_2.1.X, but they 
> should work on trunk as well) support an almost complete support for 
> namespaced XML binding. However, I'm a bit uncomfortable in committing 
> it right away since they touch an area where I have limited knowledge of 
> possible side effects. Would you rather have me commit the whole thing 
> right away or rather submit a patch in Bugzilla?
> 

+1 for putting it in right away

as I remember things were pretty stable already and I suspect since then 
you have had some practical usage already that should've straightened 
everything out, no?

any other issues coming up we'll have to take up from there (which is 
also easier if it's not just a patch applied here and there but a 
widespread new feature to be used)

-marc=
-- 
Marc Portier                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at                http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/
mpo@outerthought.org                              mpo@apache.org