You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@batchee.apache.org by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> on 2015/08/25 18:12:54 UTC
BatchEE Report - why are they monthly
All,
I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were late
and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
September).
Unless there are objections I'm going to remove them from the report and
fix their monthly attribute.
John
Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Txs John for bringing this up!
BatchEE is indeed not doing too well from a comunity aspect. The code base is pretty mature and we have quite a few folks who know the codebase and keep working on it. But it might be better if we think about not graduating to a TLP but to a subproject e.g. of Geronimo. All just ideas yet though…
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 25.08.2015 um 18:12 schrieb John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
>
> All,
>
> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
>
> If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were late
> and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
> but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
> September).
>
> Unless there are objections I'm going to remove them from the report and
> fix their monthly attribute.
>
> John
Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
I'm fine with that. It helps clean up the fact that this reporting group
has too many podlings. I'm wondering if there's anything the IPMC can do
to help balance this out more.
John
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:31 PM Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Txs for clarifying Marvin, we gonna report next month, ok?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 29.08.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
> >>
> >> If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were
> late
> >> and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
> >> but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
> >> September).
> >>
> >> Unless there are objections I'm going to remove them from the report and
> >> fix their monthly attribute.
> >
> > I've taken care of fixing podlings.xml and the September2015 report wiki
> page.
> >
> > BatchEE's last report was 2 months late, so they actually *we're*
> scheduled to
> > report last month. I've taken the liberty of moving the podling to
> another
> > quarterly group. That's not ordinarily how it's done, but otherwise
> there
> > would have been a four month gap between reports. The next report will
> be due
> > in October.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
I'm fine with that. It helps clean up the fact that this reporting group
has too many podlings. I'm wondering if there's anything the IPMC can do
to help balance this out more.
John
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:31 PM Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Txs for clarifying Marvin, we gonna report next month, ok?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 29.08.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
> >>
> >> If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were
> late
> >> and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
> >> but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
> >> September).
> >>
> >> Unless there are objections I'm going to remove them from the report and
> >> fix their monthly attribute.
> >
> > I've taken care of fixing podlings.xml and the September2015 report wiki
> page.
> >
> > BatchEE's last report was 2 months late, so they actually *we're*
> scheduled to
> > report last month. I've taken the liberty of moving the podling to
> another
> > quarterly group. That's not ordinarily how it's done, but otherwise
> there
> > would have been a four month gap between reports. The next report will
> be due
> > in October.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Txs for clarifying Marvin, we gonna report next month, ok?
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 29.08.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
>>
>> If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were late
>> and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
>> but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
>> September).
>>
>> Unless there are objections I'm going to remove them from the report and
>> fix their monthly attribute.
>
> I've taken care of fixing podlings.xml and the September2015 report wiki page.
>
> BatchEE's last report was 2 months late, so they actually *we're* scheduled to
> report last month. I've taken the liberty of moving the podling to another
> quarterly group. That's not ordinarily how it's done, but otherwise there
> would have been a four month gap between reports. The next report will be due
> in October.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Txs for clarifying Marvin, we gonna report next month, ok?
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 29.08.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
>>
>> If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were late
>> and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
>> but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
>> September).
>>
>> Unless there are objections I'm going to remove them from the report and
>> fix their monthly attribute.
>
> I've taken care of fixing podlings.xml and the September2015 report wiki page.
>
> BatchEE's last report was 2 months late, so they actually *we're* scheduled to
> report last month. I've taken the liberty of moving the podling to another
> quarterly group. That's not ordinarily how it's done, but otherwise there
> would have been a four month gap between reports. The next report will be due
> in October.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
>
> If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were late
> and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
> but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
> September).
>
> Unless there are objections I'm going to remove them from the report and
> fix their monthly attribute.
I've taken care of fixing podlings.xml and the September2015 report wiki page.
BatchEE's last report was 2 months late, so they actually *we're* scheduled to
report last month. I've taken the liberty of moving the podling to another
quarterly group. That's not ordinarily how it's done, but otherwise there
would have been a four month gap between reports. The next report will be due
in October.
Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Txs John for bringing this up!
BatchEE is indeed not doing too well from a comunity aspect. The code base is pretty mature and we have quite a few folks who know the codebase and keep working on it. But it might be better if we think about not graduating to a TLP but to a subproject e.g. of Geronimo. All just ideas yet though…
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 25.08.2015 um 18:12 schrieb John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
>
> All,
>
> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
>
> If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were late
> and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
> but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
> September).
>
> Unless there are objections I'm going to remove them from the report and
> fix their monthly attribute.
>
> John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
>
> If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were late
> and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
> but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
> September).
>
> Unless there are objections I'm going to remove them from the report and
> fix their monthly attribute.
I've taken care of fixing podlings.xml and the September2015 report wiki page.
BatchEE's last report was 2 months late, so they actually *we're* scheduled to
report last month. I've taken the liberty of moving the podling to another
quarterly group. That's not ordinarily how it's done, but otherwise there
would have been a four month gap between reports. The next report will be due
in October.
Marvin Humphrey