You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@iotdb.apache.org by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com> on 2020/09/22 08:23:29 UTC
[VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Hi,
There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
"develop", because of two reasons:
- Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
other meaning.
- the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
may be better.
We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
public.
So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
- [M] main
- [D] develop
- [K] Keep "master"
The vote will last at least 72 hours.
The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
AW: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Sorry folks … I have absolutely no idea why this landed in this list and in this thread … It’s just a thread I pinned to the top of my folder as we still haven’t moved from “master” to “develop” in IoTDB.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Datum: Montag, 8. Januar 2024 um 09:24
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Here an example of what Julian started doing:
https://github.com/apache/plc4x/blob/feature/plc4rs/protocols/tsfile/src/main/resources/protocols/tsfile/tsfile.mspec
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Datum: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2023 um 14:12
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
So …
we voted, the results were in favor … when are we planning on renaming the branches?
I’d be happy to help.
I do think we should really get rid of the “master”.
Even if it’s probably way less controversial in China, we want to welcome people from
all over the world and we should therefore pay attention to their feelings too.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org>
Datum: Dienstag, 4. Juli 2023 um 19:35
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Soooo ... I guess we had almost 3 years now ;-)
On 2020/10/12 03:56:24 "Houliang Qi" wrote:
> Hi all,
> As the vote have passed more than 72 hours, the vote results are as following
>
>
> [D] Develop +7
> [M] Main +1
> [K] Keep master 0
>
>
> And I’d like to start a new discussion about this:
>
>
> As someone mentioned that there should be a develop branch and a release branch. The develop branch is used to submit the latest development, and the release branch is used for the functions that need to be released in the latest release.
>
>
> At the same time, I hope that the development of cluster can also have two branches: cluster_develop branch and cluster_release branch.
>
>
> The cluster_develop branch is used to merge the stand-alone version of the develop branch code and the latest development of the cluster.
>
>
> The cluster_release branch is used to release some of the latest features. Only the functions that need to be released are allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch, or to fix some bugs. Other newly developed functions are not allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch. After cluster_release has been fully tested, it can be released.
>
>
> Regarding the latest release, I would like to check out a cluster_release branch after the cluster_premerge branch merges into the master (develop), and then the master branch merges into the cluster_new (cluster_develop) branch.
>
>
> And I think the new functions do not have beed tested or need more than one month to tested should be switch off when release the cluster version.
>
>
> Does anyone have some ideas about this?
>
>
> Thanks,
> ---------------------------------------
> Houliang Qi
> On 09/24/2020 02:38，Kevin A. McGrail<km...@apache.org> wrote：
> I am +1 to rename it but don't have any good input on what would be a
> good name to use going forward. I'll defer to others on that.
>
> On 9/22/2020 4:23 AM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> "develop", because of two reasons:
>
> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> other meaning.
> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> may be better.
>
> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> public.
>
> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>
> - [M] main
> - [D] develop
> - [K] Keep "master"
>
> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> KMcGrail@Apache.org
>
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>
AW: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Here an example of what Julian started doing:
https://github.com/apache/plc4x/blob/feature/plc4rs/protocols/tsfile/src/main/resources/protocols/tsfile/tsfile.mspec
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Datum: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2023 um 14:12
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
So …
we voted, the results were in favor … when are we planning on renaming the branches?
I’d be happy to help.
I do think we should really get rid of the “master”.
Even if it’s probably way less controversial in China, we want to welcome people from
all over the world and we should therefore pay attention to their feelings too.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org>
Datum: Dienstag, 4. Juli 2023 um 19:35
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Soooo ... I guess we had almost 3 years now ;-)
On 2020/10/12 03:56:24 "Houliang Qi" wrote:
> Hi all,
> As the vote have passed more than 72 hours, the vote results are as following
>
>
> [D] Develop +7
> [M] Main +1
> [K] Keep master 0
>
>
> And I’d like to start a new discussion about this:
>
>
> As someone mentioned that there should be a develop branch and a release branch. The develop branch is used to submit the latest development, and the release branch is used for the functions that need to be released in the latest release.
>
>
> At the same time, I hope that the development of cluster can also have two branches: cluster_develop branch and cluster_release branch.
>
>
> The cluster_develop branch is used to merge the stand-alone version of the develop branch code and the latest development of the cluster.
>
>
> The cluster_release branch is used to release some of the latest features. Only the functions that need to be released are allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch, or to fix some bugs. Other newly developed functions are not allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch. After cluster_release has been fully tested, it can be released.
>
>
> Regarding the latest release, I would like to check out a cluster_release branch after the cluster_premerge branch merges into the master (develop), and then the master branch merges into the cluster_new (cluster_develop) branch.
>
>
> And I think the new functions do not have beed tested or need more than one month to tested should be switch off when release the cluster version.
>
>
> Does anyone have some ideas about this?
>
>
> Thanks,
> ---------------------------------------
> Houliang Qi
> On 09/24/2020 02:38，Kevin A. McGrail<km...@apache.org> wrote：
> I am +1 to rename it but don't have any good input on what would be a
> good name to use going forward. I'll defer to others on that.
>
> On 9/22/2020 4:23 AM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> "develop", because of two reasons:
>
> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> other meaning.
> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> may be better.
>
> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> public.
>
> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>
> - [M] main
> - [D] develop
> - [K] Keep "master"
>
> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> KMcGrail@Apache.org
>
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>
AW: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
So …
we voted, the results were in favor … when are we planning on renaming the branches?
I’d be happy to help.
I do think we should really get rid of the “master”.
Even if it’s probably way less controversial in China, we want to welcome people from
all over the world and we should therefore pay attention to their feelings too.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org>
Datum: Dienstag, 4. Juli 2023 um 19:35
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Soooo ... I guess we had almost 3 years now ;-)
On 2020/10/12 03:56:24 "Houliang Qi" wrote:
> Hi all,
> As the vote have passed more than 72 hours, the vote results are as following
>
>
> [D] Develop +7
> [M] Main +1
> [K] Keep master 0
>
>
> And I’d like to start a new discussion about this:
>
>
> As someone mentioned that there should be a develop branch and a release branch. The develop branch is used to submit the latest development, and the release branch is used for the functions that need to be released in the latest release.
>
>
> At the same time, I hope that the development of cluster can also have two branches: cluster_develop branch and cluster_release branch.
>
>
> The cluster_develop branch is used to merge the stand-alone version of the develop branch code and the latest development of the cluster.
>
>
> The cluster_release branch is used to release some of the latest features. Only the functions that need to be released are allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch, or to fix some bugs. Other newly developed functions are not allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch. After cluster_release has been fully tested, it can be released.
>
>
> Regarding the latest release, I would like to check out a cluster_release branch after the cluster_premerge branch merges into the master (develop), and then the master branch merges into the cluster_new (cluster_develop) branch.
>
>
> And I think the new functions do not have beed tested or need more than one month to tested should be switch off when release the cluster version.
>
>
> Does anyone have some ideas about this?
>
>
> Thanks,
> ---------------------------------------
> Houliang Qi
> On 09/24/2020 02:38，Kevin A. McGrail<km...@apache.org> wrote：
> I am +1 to rename it but don't have any good input on what would be a
> good name to use going forward. I'll defer to others on that.
>
> On 9/22/2020 4:23 AM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> "develop", because of two reasons:
>
> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> other meaning.
> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> may be better.
>
> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> public.
>
> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>
> - [M] main
> - [D] develop
> - [K] Keep "master"
>
> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> KMcGrail@Apache.org
>
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Posted by Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org>.
Soooo ... I guess we had almost 3 years now ;-)
On 2020/10/12 03:56:24 "Houliang Qi" wrote:
> Hi all,
> As the vote have passed more than 72 hours, the vote results are as following
>
>
> [D] Develop +7
> [M] Main +1
> [K] Keep master 0
>
>
> And I’d like to start a new discussion about this:
>
>
> As someone mentioned that there should be a develop branch and a release branch. The develop branch is used to submit the latest development, and the release branch is used for the functions that need to be released in the latest release.
>
>
> At the same time, I hope that the development of cluster can also have two branches: cluster_develop branch and cluster_release branch.
>
>
> The cluster_develop branch is used to merge the stand-alone version of the develop branch code and the latest development of the cluster.
>
>
> The cluster_release branch is used to release some of the latest features. Only the functions that need to be released are allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch, or to fix some bugs. Other newly developed functions are not allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch. After cluster_release has been fully tested, it can be released.
>
>
> Regarding the latest release, I would like to check out a cluster_release branch after the cluster_premerge branch merges into the master (develop), and then the master branch merges into the cluster_new (cluster_develop) branch.
>
>
> And I think the new functions do not have beed tested or need more than one month to tested should be switch off when release the cluster version.
>
>
> Does anyone have some ideas about this?
>
>
> Thanks,
> ---------------------------------------
> Houliang Qi
> On 09/24/2020 02:38，Kevin A. McGrail<km...@apache.org> wrote：
> I am +1 to rename it but don't have any good input on what would be a
> good name to use going forward. I'll defer to others on that.
>
> On 9/22/2020 4:23 AM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> "develop", because of two reasons:
>
> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> other meaning.
> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> may be better.
>
> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> public.
>
> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>
> - [M] main
> - [D] develop
> - [K] Keep "master"
>
> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> KMcGrail@Apache.org
>
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by Houliang Qi <ne...@163.com>.
Hi Xiangdong,
Thank you for your advice and I will start a new discussion with your opinion.
Thanks,
---------------------------------------
Houliang Qi
On 10/12/2020 12:04，Xiangdong Huang<sa...@gmail.com> wrote：
Hi Houliang,
Thanks for raising this up.
1. You'd better to start a new thread entitled "[VOTE][RESULT] ....." for
the vote.
2. start another thread to discuss about the cluster version management.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Houliang Qi <ne...@163.com> 于2020年10月12日周一 上午11:57写道：
Hi all,
As the vote have passed more than 72 hours, the vote results are as
following
[D] Develop +7
[M] Main +1
[K] Keep master 0
And I’d like to start a new discussion about this:
As someone mentioned that there should be a develop branch and a release
branch. The develop branch is used to submit the latest development, and
the release branch is used for the functions that need to be released in
the latest release.
At the same time, I hope that the development of cluster can also have two
branches: cluster_develop branch and cluster_release branch.
The cluster_develop branch is used to merge the stand-alone version of the
develop branch code and the latest development of the cluster.
The cluster_release branch is used to release some of the latest features.
Only the functions that need to be released are allowed to be merged into
the cluster_release branch, or to fix some bugs. Other newly developed
functions are not allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch.
After cluster_release has been fully tested, it can be released.
Regarding the latest release, I would like to check out a cluster_release
branch after the cluster_premerge branch merges into the master (develop),
and then the master branch merges into the cluster_new (cluster_develop)
branch.
And I think the new functions do not have beed tested or need more than
one month to tested should be switch off when release the cluster version.
Does anyone have some ideas about this?
Thanks,
---------------------------------------
Houliang Qi
On 09/24/2020 02:38，Kevin A. McGrail<km...@apache.org> wrote：
I am +1 to rename it but don't have any good input on what would be a
good name to use going forward. I'll defer to others on that.
On 9/22/2020 4:23 AM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
Hi,
There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
"develop", because of two reasons:
- Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
other meaning.
- the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
may be better.
We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
public.
So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
- [M] main
- [D] develop
- [K] Keep "master"
The vote will last at least 72 hours.
The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
--
Kevin A. McGrail
KMcGrail@Apache.org
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Posted by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Houliang,
Thanks for raising this up.
1. You'd better to start a new thread entitled "[VOTE][RESULT] ....." for
the vote.
2. start another thread to discuss about the cluster version management.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Houliang Qi <ne...@163.com> 于2020年10月12日周一 上午11:57写道：
> Hi all,
> As the vote have passed more than 72 hours, the vote results are as
> following
>
>
> [D] Develop +7
> [M] Main +1
> [K] Keep master 0
>
>
> And I’d like to start a new discussion about this:
>
>
> As someone mentioned that there should be a develop branch and a release
> branch. The develop branch is used to submit the latest development, and
> the release branch is used for the functions that need to be released in
> the latest release.
>
>
> At the same time, I hope that the development of cluster can also have two
> branches: cluster_develop branch and cluster_release branch.
>
>
> The cluster_develop branch is used to merge the stand-alone version of the
> develop branch code and the latest development of the cluster.
>
>
> The cluster_release branch is used to release some of the latest features.
> Only the functions that need to be released are allowed to be merged into
> the cluster_release branch, or to fix some bugs. Other newly developed
> functions are not allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch.
> After cluster_release has been fully tested, it can be released.
>
>
> Regarding the latest release, I would like to check out a cluster_release
> branch after the cluster_premerge branch merges into the master (develop),
> and then the master branch merges into the cluster_new (cluster_develop)
> branch.
>
>
> And I think the new functions do not have beed tested or need more than
> one month to tested should be switch off when release the cluster version.
>
>
> Does anyone have some ideas about this?
>
>
> Thanks,
> ---------------------------------------
> Houliang Qi
> On 09/24/2020 02:38，Kevin A. McGrail<km...@apache.org> wrote：
> I am +1 to rename it but don't have any good input on what would be a
> good name to use going forward. I'll defer to others on that.
>
> On 9/22/2020 4:23 AM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> "develop", because of two reasons:
>
> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> other meaning.
> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> may be better.
>
> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> public.
>
> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>
> - [M] main
> - [D] develop
> - [K] Keep "master"
>
> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> KMcGrail@Apache.org
>
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by Houliang Qi <ne...@163.com>.
Hi all,
As the vote have passed more than 72 hours, the vote results are as following
[D] Develop +7
[M] Main +1
[K] Keep master 0
And I’d like to start a new discussion about this:
As someone mentioned that there should be a develop branch and a release branch. The develop branch is used to submit the latest development, and the release branch is used for the functions that need to be released in the latest release.
At the same time, I hope that the development of cluster can also have two branches: cluster_develop branch and cluster_release branch.
The cluster_develop branch is used to merge the stand-alone version of the develop branch code and the latest development of the cluster.
The cluster_release branch is used to release some of the latest features. Only the functions that need to be released are allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch, or to fix some bugs. Other newly developed functions are not allowed to be merged into the cluster_release branch. After cluster_release has been fully tested, it can be released.
Regarding the latest release, I would like to check out a cluster_release branch after the cluster_premerge branch merges into the master (develop), and then the master branch merges into the cluster_new (cluster_develop) branch.
And I think the new functions do not have beed tested or need more than one month to tested should be switch off when release the cluster version.
Does anyone have some ideas about this?
Thanks,
---------------------------------------
Houliang Qi
On 09/24/2020 02:38，Kevin A. McGrail<km...@apache.org> wrote：
I am +1 to rename it but don't have any good input on what would be a
good name to use going forward. I'll defer to others on that.
On 9/22/2020 4:23 AM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
Hi,
There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
"develop", because of two reasons:
- Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
other meaning.
- the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
may be better.
We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
public.
So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
- [M] main
- [D] develop
- [K] Keep "master"
The vote will last at least 72 hours.
The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
--
Kevin A. McGrail
KMcGrail@Apache.org
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>.
I am +1 to rename it but don't have any good input on what would be a
good name to use going forward. I'll defer to others on that.
On 9/22/2020 4:23 AM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> "develop", because of two reasons:
>
> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> other meaning.
> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> may be better.
>
> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> public.
>
> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>
> - [M] main
> - [D] develop
> - [K] Keep "master"
>
> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
--
Kevin A. McGrail
KMcGrail@Apache.org
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Posted by Qi Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
+1 for [D] develop
Haonan Hou <hh...@outlook.com> 于2020年9月23日周三 下午3:50写道：
> Hi,
>
> +1 for [D]develop
>
> Thanks,
> Haonan Hou
>
> > On Sep 23, 2020, at 11:42 AM, Jialin Qiao <qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 for [D]develop
> >
> > I used to thought that Main is more consistent with other projects,
> because github use this as the new default branch.
> >
> > But Chris convinced me. We could declare how we manage branches in the
> README for newcomers.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Jialin Qiao
> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >
> > 乔嘉林
> > 清华大学 软件学院
> >
> >> -----原始邮件-----
> >> 发件人: "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
> >> 发送时间: 2020-09-22 21:17:52 (星期二)
> >> 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
> >> 抄送:
> >> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
> "main"/"develop"
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I really like the setup where development is done on "develop" being
> the default branch and "release(s)" being the one for releases.
> >>
> >> Main, trunk, etc. for me all don't directly name what they are used
> for. With "develop"/"release" it's sort of obvious ;-)
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> Am 22.09.20, 13:31 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <sa...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> Hi Yi,
> >>
> >> Glad to see you again. Actually we had a branch called "release",
> which
> >> points to the latest release version.
> >> I think it is a "stable" branch.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> -----------------------------------
> >> Xiangdong Huang
> >> School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >>
> >> 黄向东
> >> 清华大学 软件学院
> >>
> >>
> >> 徐毅 <xu...@126.com> 于2020年9月22日周二 下午6:09写道：
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I always consider “master" branch as a stable version to use. How
> >>> about providing another “stable” branch so that our users can easily
> find a
> >>> stable version to build and deploy.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> XuYi
> >>> On 09/22/2020 17:44，Houliang Qi<ne...@163.com> wrote：
> >>> Hi, all
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> +1 for [D]Develop.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> ---------------------------------------
> >>> Houliang Qi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 09/22/2020 16:45，runhuster@foxmail.com<ru...@foxmail.com>
> wrote：
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I think develop is more suitable.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Chao Wang
> >>> BONC Ltd
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: Xiangdong Huang
> >>> Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
> >>> To: dev
> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
> >>> "main"/"develop"
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main"
> or
> >>> "develop", because of two reasons:
> >>>
> >>> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> >>> other meaning.
> >>> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As
> we
> >>> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or
> "develop"
> >>> may be better.
> >>>
> >>> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a
> vote in
> >>> public.
> >>>
> >>> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
> >>>
> >>> - [M] main
> >>> - [D] develop
> >>> - [K] Keep "master"
> >>>
> >>> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> >>> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> -----------------------------------
> >>> Xiangdong Huang
> >>> School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >>>
> >>> 黄向东
> >>> 清华大学 软件学院
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by Haonan Hou <hh...@outlook.com>.
Hi,
+1 for [D]develop
Thanks,
Haonan Hou
> On Sep 23, 2020, at 11:42 AM, Jialin Qiao <qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 for [D]develop
>
> I used to thought that Main is more consistent with other projects, because github use this as the new default branch.
>
> But Chris convinced me. We could declare how we manage branches in the README for newcomers.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jialin Qiao
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
>> -----原始邮件-----
>> 发件人: "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
>> 发送时间: 2020-09-22 21:17:52 (星期二)
>> 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
>> 抄送:
>> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I really like the setup where development is done on "develop" being the default branch and "release(s)" being the one for releases.
>>
>> Main, trunk, etc. for me all don't directly name what they are used for. With "develop"/"release" it's sort of obvious ;-)
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Am 22.09.20, 13:31 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <sa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi Yi,
>>
>> Glad to see you again. Actually we had a branch called "release", which
>> points to the latest release version.
>> I think it is a "stable" branch.
>>
>> Best,
>> -----------------------------------
>> Xiangdong Huang
>> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>>
>> 黄向东
>> 清华大学 软件学院
>>
>>
>> 徐毅 <xu...@126.com> 于2020年9月22日周二 下午6:09写道：
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I always consider “master" branch as a stable version to use. How
>>> about providing another “stable” branch so that our users can easily find a
>>> stable version to build and deploy.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> XuYi
>>> On 09/22/2020 17:44，Houliang Qi<ne...@163.com> wrote：
>>> Hi, all
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 for [D]Develop.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> Houliang Qi
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/22/2020 16:45，runhuster@foxmail.com<ru...@foxmail.com> wrote：
>>> Hi,
>>> I think develop is more suitable.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Chao Wang
>>> BONC Ltd
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Xiangdong Huang
>>> Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
>>> To: dev
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
>>> "main"/"develop"
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
>>> "develop", because of two reasons:
>>>
>>> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
>>> other meaning.
>>> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
>>> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
>>> may be better.
>>>
>>> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
>>> public.
>>>
>>> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>>>
>>> - [M] main
>>> - [D] develop
>>> - [K] Keep "master"
>>>
>>> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
>>> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> -----------------------------------
>>> Xiangdong Huang
>>> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>>>
>>> 黄向东
>>> 清华大学 软件学院
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by Jialin Qiao <qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>.
Hi,
+1 for [D]develop
I used to thought that Main is more consistent with other projects, because github use this as the new default branch.
But Chris convinced me. We could declare how we manage branches in the README for newcomers.
Thanks,
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>
> 发送时间: 2020-09-22 21:17:52 (星期二)
> 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" <de...@iotdb.apache.org>
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
>
> Hi all,
>
> I really like the setup where development is done on "develop" being the default branch and "release(s)" being the one for releases.
>
> Main, trunk, etc. for me all don't directly name what they are used for. With "develop"/"release" it's sort of obvious ;-)
>
> Chris
>
> Am 22.09.20, 13:31 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <sa...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Yi,
>
> Glad to see you again. Actually we had a branch called "release", which
> points to the latest release version.
> I think it is a "stable" branch.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
>
> 徐毅 <xu...@126.com> 于2020年9月22日周二 下午6:09写道：
>
> > Hi,
> > I always consider “master" branch as a stable version to use. How
> > about providing another “stable” branch so that our users can easily find a
> > stable version to build and deploy.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > XuYi
> > On 09/22/2020 17:44，Houliang Qi<ne...@163.com> wrote：
> > Hi, all
> >
> >
> > +1 for [D]Develop.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ---------------------------------------
> > Houliang Qi
> >
> >
> > On 09/22/2020 16:45，runhuster@foxmail.com<ru...@foxmail.com> wrote：
> > Hi,
> > I think develop is more suitable.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Chao Wang
> > BONC Ltd
> >
> >
> > From: Xiangdong Huang
> > Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
> > To: dev
> > Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
> > "main"/"develop"
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> > "develop", because of two reasons:
> >
> > - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> > other meaning.
> > - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> > use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> > may be better.
> >
> > We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> > public.
> >
> > So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
> >
> > - [M] main
> > - [D] develop
> > - [K] Keep "master"
> >
> > The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> > The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
> >
> > Best,
> > -----------------------------------
> > Xiangdong Huang
> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >
> > 黄向东
> > 清华大学 软件学院
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi all,
I really like the setup where development is done on "develop" being the default branch and "release(s)" being the one for releases.
Main, trunk, etc. for me all don't directly name what they are used for. With "develop"/"release" it's sort of obvious ;-)
Chris
Am 22.09.20, 13:31 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <sa...@gmail.com>:
Hi Yi,
Glad to see you again. Actually we had a branch called "release", which
points to the latest release version.
I think it is a "stable" branch.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
徐毅 <xu...@126.com> 于2020年9月22日周二 下午6:09写道：
> Hi,
> I always consider “master" branch as a stable version to use. How
> about providing another “stable” branch so that our users can easily find a
> stable version to build and deploy.
>
>
> Thanks
> XuYi
> On 09/22/2020 17:44，Houliang Qi<ne...@163.com> wrote：
> Hi, all
>
>
> +1 for [D]Develop.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> ---------------------------------------
> Houliang Qi
>
>
> On 09/22/2020 16:45，runhuster@foxmail.com<ru...@foxmail.com> wrote：
> Hi,
> I think develop is more suitable.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Chao Wang
> BONC Ltd
>
>
> From: Xiangdong Huang
> Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
> To: dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
> "main"/"develop"
> Hi,
>
> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> "develop", because of two reasons:
>
> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> other meaning.
> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> may be better.
>
> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> public.
>
> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>
> - [M] main
> - [D] develop
> - [K] Keep "master"
>
> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Posted by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Yi,
Glad to see you again. Actually we had a branch called "release", which
points to the latest release version.
I think it is a "stable" branch.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
徐毅 <xu...@126.com> 于2020年9月22日周二 下午6:09写道：
> Hi,
> I always consider “master" branch as a stable version to use. How
> about providing another “stable” branch so that our users can easily find a
> stable version to build and deploy.
>
>
> Thanks
> XuYi
> On 09/22/2020 17:44，Houliang Qi<ne...@163.com> wrote：
> Hi, all
>
>
> +1 for [D]Develop.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> ---------------------------------------
> Houliang Qi
>
>
> On 09/22/2020 16:45，runhuster@foxmail.com<ru...@foxmail.com> wrote：
> Hi,
> I think develop is more suitable.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Chao Wang
> BONC Ltd
>
>
> From: Xiangdong Huang
> Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
> To: dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
> "main"/"develop"
> Hi,
>
> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> "develop", because of two reasons:
>
> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> other meaning.
> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> may be better.
>
> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> public.
>
> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>
> - [M] main
> - [D] develop
> - [K] Keep "master"
>
> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by 孙泽嵩 <sz...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>.
+1 for [D]evelop.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Zesong Sun
School of Software, Tsinghua University
孙泽嵩
清华大学 软件学院
> 2020年9月22日 18:09，徐毅 <xu...@126.com> 写道：
>
> Hi,
> I always consider “master" branch as a stable version to use. How about providing another “stable” branch so that our users can easily find a stable version to build and deploy.
>
>
> Thanks
> XuYi
> On 09/22/2020 17:44，Houliang Qi<ne...@163.com> wrote：
> Hi, all
>
>
> +1 for [D]Develop.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> ---------------------------------------
> Houliang Qi
>
>
> On 09/22/2020 16:45，runhuster@foxmail.com<ru...@foxmail.com> wrote：
> Hi,
> I think develop is more suitable.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Chao Wang
> BONC Ltd
>
>
> From: Xiangdong Huang
> Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
> To: dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
> Hi,
>
> There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
> "develop", because of two reasons:
>
> - Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
> other meaning.
> - the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
> use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
> may be better.
>
> We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
> public.
>
> So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
>
> - [M] main
> - [D] develop
> - [K] Keep "master"
>
> The vote will last at least 72 hours.
> The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by 徐毅 <xu...@126.com>.
Hi,
I always consider “master" branch as a stable version to use. How about providing another “stable” branch so that our users can easily find a stable version to build and deploy.
Thanks
XuYi
On 09/22/2020 17:44，Houliang Qi<ne...@163.com> wrote：
Hi, all
+1 for [D]Develop.
Thanks,
---------------------------------------
Houliang Qi
On 09/22/2020 16:45，runhuster@foxmail.com<ru...@foxmail.com> wrote：
Hi,
I think develop is more suitable.
Thanks.
Chao Wang
BONC Ltd
From: Xiangdong Huang
Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Hi,
There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
"develop", because of two reasons:
- Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
other meaning.
- the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
may be better.
We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
public.
So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
- [M] main
- [D] develop
- [K] Keep "master"
The vote will last at least 72 hours.
The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by Dawei Liu <at...@163.com>.
Hi,
+1 for [M]main
I think `main` is more like ready to release branch
Bests,
Dawei
On 09/22/2020 17:44，Houliang Qi<ne...@163.com> wrote：
Hi, all
+1 for [D]Develop.
Thanks,
---------------------------------------
Houliang Qi
On 09/22/2020 16:45，runhuster@foxmail.com<ru...@foxmail.com> wrote：
Hi,
I think develop is more suitable.
Thanks.
Chao Wang
BONC Ltd
From: Xiangdong Huang
Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Hi,
There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
"develop", because of two reasons:
- Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
other meaning.
- the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
may be better.
We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
public.
So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
- [M] main
- [D] develop
- [K] Keep "master"
The vote will last at least 72 hours.
The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to
"main"/"develop"
Posted by Houliang Qi <ne...@163.com>.
Hi, all
+1 for [D]Develop.
Thanks,
---------------------------------------
Houliang Qi
On 09/22/2020 16:45，runhuster@foxmail.com<ru...@foxmail.com> wrote：
Hi,
I think develop is more suitable.
Thanks.
Chao Wang
BONC Ltd
From: Xiangdong Huang
Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Hi,
There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
"develop", because of two reasons:
- Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
other meaning.
- the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
may be better.
We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
public.
So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
- [M] main
- [D] develop
- [K] Keep "master"
The vote will last at least 72 hours.
The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Re: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Posted by "runhuster@foxmail.com" <ru...@foxmail.com>.
Hi,
I think develop is more suitable.
Thanks.
Chao Wang
BONC Ltd
From: Xiangdong Huang
Date: 2020-09-22 16:23
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the default branch from "master" to "main"/"develop"
Hi,
There is a movement to move the default branch from "master" to "main" or
"develop", because of two reasons:
- Many people around the world thought the word "master" has some ....
other meaning.
- the word "master" can not clearly describe the branch's purpose. As we
use the branch as our main working/developing branch, "main" or "develop"
may be better.
We had a discussion on private@ and I think it is time to start a vote in
public.
So, I'd like to call a formal vote for changing the default branch:
- [M] main
- [D] develop
- [K] Keep "master"
The vote will last at least 72 hours.
The name who gets the most votes (and >= 3 votes) wins.
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院