You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by "Krisztian Szucs (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/02/21 13:48:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (ARROW-4648) [C++/Question] Naming/organizational
inconsistencies in cpp codebase
Krisztian Szucs created ARROW-4648:
--------------------------------------
Summary: [C++/Question] Naming/organizational inconsistencies in cpp codebase
Key: ARROW-4648
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4648
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Krisztian Szucs
Even after my eyes are used to the codebase, I still find the namings and/or code organization inconsistent.
h2. File Formats
So arrow already support a couple of file formats, namely parquet, feather, json, csv, orc, but their placement in the codebase is quiet odd:
- parquet: src/parquet
- feather: src/arrow/ipc/feather
- orc: src/arrow/adapters/orc
- csv: src/arrow/csv
- json: src/arrow/json
I might misunderstand the purpose of these sources, but I'd expect them to be organized under the same roof.
h2. Inter-Process-Communication vs. Flight
I'd expect flight's functionality from the ipc names.
Flight's placement is a bit odd too, because it has its own codename, it should be placed under cpp/src - like parquet, plasma, or gandiva.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)