You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/04/24 04:40:41 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34595] - Long IP is considered

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34595>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34595


slive@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Long IP is considered       |Long IP is considered




------- Additional Comments From slive@apache.org  2005-04-24 04:40 -------
Actually, RFC2396 seems pretty clear that that is not a valid way of expressing 
an IP addresses, and that is the spec followed by HTTP/1.1:
IPv4address   = 1*digit "." 1*digit "." 1*digit "." 1*digit

I'm not sure why you would ever want to use that either.  The only time I've 
seen it used is spammers trying to hide their true location.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org