You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@hudi.apache.org by "kbuci (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/02/06 00:10:14 UTC

Re: [PR] fix: (table-services) When using multiwriter do not delete pending roll… [hudi]

kbuci commented on PR #18093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/18093#issuecomment-3857080487

   > changes in this PR looks good to me. but wondering, how do we take care of such failed rollback plans? won't it be lying around and could block the archival later. Who owns the cleaning up the corrupted or failed rollback plans incase of multi-writer mode.
   > 
   > We don't need to block this patch, but as a follow up.
   
   Hmm, I think in order to give any suggestions on that I wanted to understand the following: Is it possible (Due to a DFS transient failure) for any non-empty instant file ( a rollback/table serivce plan, commit metadata, etc) to be partially written to DFS? Since if so that kinda widens the scope of our problem I believe.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@hudi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org