You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Joris Van den Bossche (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/04/15 08:49:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (ARROW-16204) [C++][Dataset] Default error existing_data_behaviour for writing dataset ignores "part-{i}.ext" files

Joris Van den Bossche created ARROW-16204:
---------------------------------------------

             Summary: [C++][Dataset] Default error existing_data_behaviour for writing dataset ignores "part-{i}.ext" files 
                 Key: ARROW-16204
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-16204
             Project: Apache Arrow
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: C++
            Reporter: Joris Van den Bossche
             Fix For: 8.0.0


While trying to understand a failing test in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/12811#discussion_r851128672, I noticed that the {{write_dataset}} function does not actually always raise an error by default if there is already existing data in the target location.

The documentation says it will raise "if any data exists in the destination" (which is also what I would expect), but in practice it seems that it does ignore certain file names:

{code:python}
import pyarrow.dataset as ds
table = pa.table({'a': [1, 2, 3]})

# write a first time to new directory: OK
>>> ds.write_dataset(table, "test_overwrite", format="parquet")
>>> !ls test_overwrite
part-0.parquet

# write a second time to the same directory: passes, but should raise?
>>> ds.write_dataset(table, "test_overwrite", format="parquet")
>>> !ls test_overwrite
part-0.parquet

# write a another time to the same directory with different name: still passes
>>> ds.write_dataset(table, "test_overwrite", format="parquet", basename_template="data-{i}.parquet")
>>> !ls test_overwrite
data-0.parquet	part-0.parquet

# now writing again finally raises an error
>>> ds.write_dataset(table, "test_overwrite", format="parquet")
...
ArrowInvalid: Could not write to test_overwrite as the directory is not empty and existing_data_behavior is to error
{code}

So it seems that when checking if existing data exists, it seems to ignore any files that match the basename template pattern.

cc [~westonpace] do you know if this was intentional? (I would find that a strange corner case, and in any case it is also not documented)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)