You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@falcon.apache.org by "Srikanth Sundarrajan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/03 11:42:34 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (FALCON-145) Feed eviction be implemented in appropriate Storage implementation

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Srikanth Sundarrajan reassigned FALCON-145:
-------------------------------------------

    Assignee: Srikanth Sundarrajan  (was: Ajay Yadav)

> Feed eviction be implemented in appropriate Storage implementation
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-145
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-145
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Venkatesh Seetharam
>            Assignee: Srikanth Sundarrajan
>         Attachments: FALCON-145-v2.patch, FALCON-145-v3.patch, FALCON-145-v4.patch, falcon-145.patch
>
>
> Since the feed storage is abstracted in Storage class either as FileSystemStorage or CatalogStorage, moreover, behaviors for listing partitions and drop partitions are listed there, why do we need to hardcode the eviction behavior and instance deletion discovery for filesystem need to happen in FeedEvictor ? Why can't be implemented in appropriate Storage implementation. That way FeedEvictor would simpler and lot cleaner. 
> This can apply to table replication as well for import and export of partitions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)