You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/09/23 22:13:26 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (TAP5-933) EnumValueEncoder will create a ValueEncoder even when there's a specific String->Enum type coercion

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Howard M. Lewis Ship closed TAP5-933.
-------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 5.3
         Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship

Fixed as part of TAP5-1331.

> EnumValueEncoder will create a ValueEncoder even when there's a specific String->Enum type coercion
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-933
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-933
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.2.0
>            Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
>            Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.3
>
>
> Had a client who was confused: they had contributed a String->TheirEnum type coercion but it wasn't working in their activation contexts. Turns out the EnumValueEncoderFactory contribution to ValueEncoderSource was being used instead, ignoring their coercion.
> I'm wondering if there's a way that ValueEncoderSource and/or EnumValueEncoderFactory could be smarter about seeing if there is a specific String->Enum coercion and making use of it instead of EnumValueEncoder (which uses Enum.valueOf() ).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira