You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Oliver Fischer <pl...@snafu.de> on 2002/05/13 15:34:46 UTC
[OT] RangeIterator
Hello,
some days ago I posted my RangeIterator after a short discussion.
Unfortunately I didn't get any positiv or negativ response on it.
Did someone look at it?
Bye
Oliver Fischer
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [OT] RangeIterator
Posted by Ivelin Ivanov <iv...@apache.org>.
Can you please repost your message, I don't recall which one it was.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oliver Fischer" <pl...@snafu.de>
To: "commons-dev" <co...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: [OT] RangeIterator
> Hello,
>
> some days ago I posted my RangeIterator after a short discussion.
> Unfortunately I didn't get any positiv or negativ response on it.
>
> Did someone look at it?
>
> Bye
>
> Oliver Fischer
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [OT] RangeIterator
Posted by "Michael A. Smith" <ma...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Oliver Fischer wrote:
> some days ago I posted my RangeIterator after a short discussion.
> Unfortunately I didn't get any positiv or negativ response on it.
>
> Did someone look at it?
Oliver,
This message from Paul Jack and the included quoted message from James
Strachan summarize the conclusions from the discussion (at least from my
viewpoint):
http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg06457.html
In other words, I don't think the RangeIterator provides enough new
functionality over the existing FilterIterator to warrant its addition.
regards,
michael
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>