You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@curator.apache.org by "Scott Blum (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/05/02 19:56:04 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (CURATOR-406) The CURATOR-3.0 branch should
become master
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993606#comment-15993606 ]
Scott Blum edited comment on CURATOR-406 at 5/2/17 7:55 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
Do you want the old master as `master-2.0` or `CURATOR-2.0` to match with the current scheme that `CURATOR-3.0` suggests?
was (Author: dragonsinth):
Do you want the old master as "master-2.0" or "CURATOR-2.0" to match with the current scheme that CURATOR-3.0 suggests?
> The CURATOR-3.0 branch should become master
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-406
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-406
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: General
> Affects Versions: 3.3.0, 2.12.0
> Reporter: Jordan Zimmerman
> Assignee: Scott Blum
>
> Currently, we have two main git branches, {{master}} (corresponding to Curator 2.x) and {{CURATOR\-3.0}}. {{master}} should become {{master\-2.0}} and {{CURATOR\-3.0}} should become {{master}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)