[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4664) Kafka 9 processors test is brittle

["ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16279112#comment-16279112 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4664:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user joewitt opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2319

    NIFI-4664, NIFI-4662, NIFI-4660, NIFI-4659 moved tests which are timi…

    …ng/threading/network dependent and brittle to integration tests and un-ignored tests that are IT
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)?
    
    - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/joewitt/incubator-nifi NIFI-4664

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2319.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2319
    
----
commit 9ef4540a42efc3bb8b07f8dc9082081edd81af14
Author: joewitt <jo...@apache.org>
Date:   2017-12-05T19:44:07Z

    NIFI-4664, NIFI-4662, NIFI-4660, NIFI-4659 moved tests which are timing/threading/network dependent and brittle to integration tests and un-ignored tests that are IT

----


> Kafka 9 processors test is brittle
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4664
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4664
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Extensions, Tools and Build
>         Environment: travis-ci
>            Reporter: Joseph Witt
>            Assignee: Joseph Witt
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> Tests run: 5, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.595 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest
> validateConsumerRetainer(org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest)  Time elapsed: 0.457 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> org.mockito.exceptions.verification.NoInteractionsWanted: 
> No interactions wanted here:
> -> at org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest.validateConsumerRetainer(ConsumeKafkaTest.java:205)
> But found this interaction on mock 'Mock for ConsumerPool, hashCode: 349420578':
> -> at org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> ***
> For your reference, here is the list of all invocations ([?] - means unverified).
> 1. -> at org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> 2. [?]-> at org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> 	at org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest.validateConsumerRetainer(ConsumeKafkaTest.java:205)
> Running org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.TestPublishKafka
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.095 sec - in org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.TestPublishKafka
> Results :
> Failed tests: 
>   ConsumeKafkaTest.validateConsumerRetainer:205 
> No interactions wanted here:
> -> at org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafkaTest.validateConsumerRetainer(ConsumeKafkaTest.java:205)
> But found this interaction on mock 'Mock for ConsumerPool, hashCode: 349420578':
> -> at org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> ***
> For your reference, here is the list of all invocations ([?] - means unverified).
> 1. -> at org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)
> 2. [?]-> at org.apache.nifi.processors.kafka.pubsub.ConsumeKafka.lambda$onScheduled$0(ConsumeKafka.java:326)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)