You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2007/02/06 15:00:35 UTC

Vote Summary (Was: Re: Vote request: Accept mod_ftp podling for graduation)

Summary of mod_ftp graduation voting:

+1 on graduation (acceptance of code to httpd):
     Justin Erenkrantz
     Jim Jagielski
     Ruediger Pluem
     Will Rowe
     Sander Temme

No -1 votes, so I would call the vote as approving
graduation.

The consensus is that:

   1. mod_ftp be a httpd sub-project (ala mod_box)
   2. mod_ftp will use the httpd lists (dev, user, etc...)
      and not have separate lists

I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
process.

Re: Vote Summary (Was: Re: Vote request: Accept mod_ftp podling for graduation)

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.

On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:15 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
>>> and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
>>> process.
>>
>> Ping?
>
> I mostly bring this up because the reports are due in about three  
> days,
> and it would be worthwhile to post the final 'incubating mod_ftp'  
> report
> with it's disposition on the next board report.
>

FWIW, mod_ftp is/was due next month... ;)

Re: Vote Summary (Was: Re: Vote request: Accept mod_ftp podling for graduation)

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
>> I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
>> and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
>> process.
> 
> Ping?

I mostly bring this up because the reports are due in about three days,
and it would be worthwhile to post the final 'incubating mod_ftp' report
with it's disposition on the next board report.

Re: Vote Summary (Was: Re: Vote request: Accept mod_ftp podling for graduation)

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Summary of mod_ftp graduation voting:
> +1 on graduation (acceptance of code to httpd):

Don't forget Nick in the final tally :)

> I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
> and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
> process.

Ping?

Re: Vote Summary (Was: Re: Vote request: Accept mod_ftp podling for graduation)

Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com>.

On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:00:35 -0500
Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:

> Summary of mod_ftp graduation voting:
> 
> +1 on graduation (acceptance of code to httpd):
>      Justin Erenkrantz
>      Jim Jagielski
>      Ruediger Pluem
>      Will Rowe
>      Sander Temme
> 
> No -1 votes, so I would call the vote as approving
> graduation.

Hehe.  If you hadn't added the complexity of two different
options, you might have got a bigger response.

> The consensus is that:
> 
>    1. mod_ftp be a httpd sub-project (ala mod_box)
>    2. mod_ftp will use the httpd lists (dev, user, etc...)
>       and not have separate lists
> 
> I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
> and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
> process.

+1 to that.

-- 
Nick Kew

Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/