You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Michael Wentzel <we...@aswethink.com> on 2002/01/18 16:10:47 UTC
RE: Advantages using Apache httpd
> What are the advantages from using Apache with Tomcat instead of a
> stand-alone Tomcat?
> I've read the docs but I wanted to hear from other people with
> experience from using it.
Apache is a fine tuned httpd for static content and therefore typically
suppasses Tomcat for serving static content. In addition, utilizing
Apache also allows you to use other dynamic content such as PHP, Perl,
etc...
Our deliverables have always been with either an IIS or Apache integration
so I can't speak for a comparison of the production performance comparison
between these configurations but it basically comes down to a couple things:
* do you want to fine tune your webserver?
* are you going to have a good deal of static content?
If you answer yes to one or both of these then I would personally suggest
using integration.
---
Michael Wentzel
Software Developer
Software As We Think - http://www.aswethink.com
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Advantages using Apache httpd
Posted by Emerson <em...@tre-sc.gov.br>.
Another question about apache:
The time that goes between apache delegating requests to tomcat and tomcat
answering back instead of tomcat answering directly is worthwhile???
At 10:10 18/1/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>> What are the advantages from using Apache with Tomcat instead of a
>> stand-alone Tomcat?
>> I've read the docs but I wanted to hear from other people with
>> experience from using it.
>
>Apache is a fine tuned httpd for static content and therefore typically
>suppasses Tomcat for serving static content. In addition, utilizing
>Apache also allows you to use other dynamic content such as PHP, Perl,
>etc...
>
>Our deliverables have always been with either an IIS or Apache integration
>so I can't speak for a comparison of the production performance comparison
>between these configurations but it basically comes down to a couple things:
>
>* do you want to fine tune your webserver?
>* are you going to have a good deal of static content?
>
>If you answer yes to one or both of these then I would personally suggest
>using integration.
>
>
>---
>Michael Wentzel
>Software Developer
>Software As We Think - http://www.aswethink.com
>
>--
>To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
Emerson Cargnin
TRE-SC
Setor de Desenvolvimento
Tel: (48) 251-3700 - Ramal 3134
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
JBUilder and connectionn pool
Posted by Emerson <em...@tre-sc.gov.br>.
I using JBuilder to Debug my web-apps and ConnectionPool from
http://www.bitmechanic.com/projects/jdbcpool/ (James Cooper) They instruct
to make a unique sevlet to do all the configuration of the connections. I
always use to instantiate a different pool for each app. The advantage of
the new approach is it reuses db connections of the same db/user among
diferent apps.
The big problem is to continue to debug apps directly inside JBuilder 5, as
it uses a server8080.xml for each debugging (and recreates it each time, so
you can't add a Context path in server8080.xml), and sets the contexts
paths directly in it. And I have to make sure the db servlet that initiates
the pools in started before starting a web app to be debugged.
Have anybody done that???
Emerson Cargnin
TRE-SC
Setor de Desenvolvimento
Tel: (48) 251-3700 - Ramal 3134
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>