Re: DNS changes for spamassassin.org ?

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Theo Van Dinter writes:
> I see this change locally on the zones box, but not in svn ...  If you
> need to change things, please edit the spamassassin/dns files in svn,
> then do an "svn update" in /var/named on the zones box.
> 
> I'm leaving the change local for now -- IMO, we should change tests to
> use dnsbltest instead of a real host in the domain.
> 
> --- spamassassin.org    (revision 357404)
> +++ spamassassin.org    (working copy)
> @@ -21,7 +21,9 @@
>                         A       192.87.106.226
>  
>  ; bugzilla!
> -bugzilla               CNAME   issues.apache.org.
> +bugzilla               A       192.87.106.226
> +                       ; nothing should send from here, but allow spf testing
> +bugzilla               TXT     "v=spf1 ip4:64.142.3.173 -ip4:65.214.43.155 ~ip4:65.214.43.156 ?ip4:65.214.43.157 -all"
>  
>  ; stuff that runs on the zones machine
>  rsync                  CNAME   spamassassin.zones.apache.org.

!  did someone else apply that patch?  When I tried, it told me this
had already been applied, hence was a .rej.

We could do with a /var/named/README documenting the procedure on
keeping svn and /var/named in sync, I think.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFDpMm2MJF5cimLx9ARArc/AKCCiib9ZTXTrvsRU+nKnSB+VtehegCffFCh
Tjj+o6+R9UsoQd79xltTVOw=
=erPU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: DNS changes for spamassassin.org ?

["Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>]

Justin Mason wrote:

> Theo Van Dinter writes:

>> I'm leaving the change local for now -- IMO, we should change tests to
>> use dnsbltest instead of a real host in the domain.

I think everyone agrees with that.  It was noted in the bug.

The idea was to fix the make test failures (when net tests are enabled) 
in our latest released version (3.1.0).  After a couple releases we 
could revert the change in favour of tests against dnsbltest that I'll 
add when I make the new tests for the other SPF bug (also noted in the bug).


> !  did someone else apply that patch?  When I tried, it told me this
> had already been applied, hence was a .rej.

Theo committed changes to the zone file since I made the patch, so the 
serial number change will be rejected along with anything else that no 
longer matches up.

I didn't commit it myself to avoid this since I would only be able to 
complete half the process and I really don't have any business modifying 
the project's public DNS.


Daryl