CF to catch big O's?

["Scott Williams , Area4" <sw...@area4.k12.il.us>]

Does anyone have a filter that would catch this one below?

Unfortunately, my filter even learned it a ham !  UGh!

thanks

SCott



>Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:48:03 -0500
>Subject: Squirting Orgasmic VidClips lsbrown
>From: Female Gushers <Fe...@froidnet.com>
>To: lsbrown@sjo.k12.il.us
>Return-Path: FemaleGushers@froidnet.com
>X-Sender: FemaleGushers@froidnet.com
>X-Mailer: Mailer Software (rev. 01/15/2004)
>Message-Id: <xk...@mail.froidnet.com>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="ncyfexuabmqwqisb"
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
>         smtp3.area4.k12.il.us
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_30 autolearn=ham
>         version=2.61
>X-Spam-Level:
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Mar 2004 18:46:41.0190 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[02553C60:01C414F5]
>
>Intense Female Orgasmic Ejaculations
>Some of them squirt a FOOT high into
>the air! You will love this:
>
>http://froidnet.com/gushingcunts-ft/?gaid=11&ape=gt2496
>
>ClickABOVE or type it into a browser:
>
>http://froidnet.com/gushingcunts-ft/?gaid=11&ape=gt2496
>
>
>If you don't want any more mail from us:
>http://froidnet.com/nomoremail/



Scott Williams,  CCNA

Ph:   217-893-1431
Em:    swilliams@area4.k12.il.us
Website: www.area4.k12.il.us

Area 4 Technology Center
200 S. Fredrick, Suite 305
Rantoul, IL  61866

Re: CF to catch big O's?

["Scott Williams , Area4" <sw...@area4.k12.il.us>]

Thanks Bob,

I think this will help.  Found a few more rules sets I did not have in my 
tool box.

Thanks

SCott

At 12:23 PM 3/30/2004, Bob George wrote:
>Scott Williams , Area4 wrote:
>
>>Does anyone have a filter that would catch this one below?
>>Unfortunately, my filter even learned it a ham !  UGh!
>
>With my existing rules, it scored a 2.1. Not flagged, but at least not 
>auto-trained:
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_90 autolearn=no 
>version=2.6
>
>Looks like my previous bayes training got close, but not quite.
>
>After training SA bayes on that specific message:
>X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=no 
>version=2.63
>
>Better, but 1st one slips through until trained.
>
>After adding: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_adult.cf
>X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.7 required=5.0 
>tests=BAYES_99,SARE_ADULT2,SARE_BETTERORG autolearn=no version=2.63
>
>I've been avoiding those content-specific rules, but it looks like they 
>may be called for to help nudge bayes along, at least initially.
>
>- Bob

Scott Williams,  CCNA

Ph:   217-893-1431
Em:    swilliams@area4.k12.il.us
Website: www.area4.k12.il.us

Area 4 Technology Center
200 S. Fredrick, Suite 305
Rantoul, IL  61866

Re: CF to catch big O's?

[Bob George <ma...@ttlexceeded.com>]

Scott Williams , Area4 wrote:

> Does anyone have a filter that would catch this one below?
> 
> Unfortunately, my filter even learned it a ham !  UGh!

With my existing rules, it scored a 2.1. Not flagged, but at least not 
auto-trained:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_90 autolearn=no 
version=2.6

Looks like my previous bayes training got close, but not quite.

After training SA bayes on that specific message:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=no 
version=2.63

Better, but 1st one slips through until trained.

After adding: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_adult.cf
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.7 required=5.0 
tests=BAYES_99,SARE_ADULT2,SARE_BETTERORG autolearn=no version=2.63

I've been avoiding those content-specific rules, but it looks like they 
may be called for to help nudge bayes along, at least initially.

- Bob

Re: CF to catch big O's?

[Kenneth Porter <sh...@sewingwitch.com>]

--On Tuesday, March 30, 2004 11:04 AM -0600 "Scott Williams , Area4" 
<sw...@area4.k12.il.us> wrote:

>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
>>         smtp3.area4.k12.il.us

I don't know how much it will help, but have you considered upgrading?