You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Robert Metzger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/12/08 06:41:09 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-18060) Add notice for heap-based state backend of state access reference problem

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Robert Metzger updated FLINK-18060:
-----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.12.0)
                   1.13.0

> Add notice for heap-based state backend of state access reference problem
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-18060
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18060
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.1
>            Reporter: Yun Tang
>            Assignee: Yun Tang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.13.0
>
>
> Currently, when talking about the limitation of {{MemoryStateBackend}} and {{FsStateBackend}} in [documentation|https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/ops/state/state_backends.html#the-memorystatebackend], Flink only focus on the memory checkpoint size limit. However, current documentation forgets to talk about the reference problem, which added in {{CopyOnWriteStateMap}}:
> {noformat}
> IMPORTANT: the contracts for this class rely on the user not holding any references to objects returned by this map beyond the life cycle of per-element operations. Or phrased differently, all get-update-put operations on a mapping should be within one call of processElement. Otherwise, the user must take care of taking deep copies, e.g. for caching purposes.
> {noformat}
> This actually also applies to {{NestedStateMap}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)