You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org> on 2015/11/20 16:36:47 UTC
New committer process
According to this link
(https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html): "Identifying
potential new committers, calling a vote for their recognition as a
committer and processing the relevant documents is something that the whole
community can contribute to."
But it also says something about private voting.... "We do the vote on the
private mailing list to enable a frank discussion."
It looks like the private voting isn't required to become formal, but a
good to have if we are not sure about inviting a new committer. I guess
this would avoid an awkward "no" during the voting process. (?)
[]s,
Thiago.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Not the way it is generally. Main point is suppose we say no...Daniel would
> leave the project where the no can also mean " let's see a bit more".
>
> That said such demand generally has some notable contribution on the
> project to promote the candidate to help evaluating the guy - we all know
> Daniel I guess so it is just a "for next round" comment.
>
> @pmc: do we keep it there or do we move it to private to stay formal?
> Le 20 nov. 2015 06:59, "Alex Soto" <as...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > I agree with Andy it is a transparent way so all community can know this.
> > Of course I cannot vote, but it is good to know that Daniel is here too
> :)
> >
> > El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 15:58, Andy Gumbrecht (<
> > agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>) va escriure:
> >
> >> I started it - Thought it was supposed to be on dev?
> >>
> >> On 20/11/2015 15:55, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >> >
> >> > How so does it happen on dev? Maybe missed something bit this kind of
> >> > discussion should be done on private.
> >> >
> >> > Le 20 nov. 2015 04:31, "Thiago Veronezi" <thiago@veronezi.org
> >> > <ma...@veronezi.org>> a écrit :
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Daniel is an awesome developer with deep JavaEE knowledge along
> >> > with deep
> >> > Linux understanding. He will definitely be a great addition to the
> >> > project.
> >> > Thank you for all your contributions Daniel!
> >> >
> >> > []s,
> >> > Thiago.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Andy Gumbrecht
> >> > <agumbrecht@tomitribe.com <ma...@tomitribe.com>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I would like to propose that we accept DeltaSpike committer
> >> > Daniel Cunha
> >> > > as a committer on the TomEE project.
> >> > > Dani has been a long time supporter and contributor to the TomEE
> >> > project.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please reposond with a +1, 0, or -1, and any rationale you would
> >> > like to
> >> > > provide.
> >> > >
> >> > > Voting ends one week from today.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Andy
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Andy Gumbrecht
> >> > > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andy Gumbrecht
> >> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>
> >>
>
Re: New committer process
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
It is established practice at most ASF projects to discuss and vote for new committers in private.
And it makes perfect sense btw.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 20.11.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>:
>
> According to this link
> (https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html): "Identifying
> potential new committers, calling a vote for their recognition as a
> committer and processing the relevant documents is something that the whole
> community can contribute to."
>
> But it also says something about private voting.... "We do the vote on the
> private mailing list to enable a frank discussion."
>
> It looks like the private voting isn't required to become formal, but a
> good to have if we are not sure about inviting a new committer. I guess
> this would avoid an awkward "no" during the voting process. (?)
>
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Not the way it is generally. Main point is suppose we say no...Daniel would
>> leave the project where the no can also mean " let's see a bit more".
>>
>> That said such demand generally has some notable contribution on the
>> project to promote the candidate to help evaluating the guy - we all know
>> Daniel I guess so it is just a "for next round" comment.
>>
>> @pmc: do we keep it there or do we move it to private to stay formal?
>> Le 20 nov. 2015 06:59, "Alex Soto" <as...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> I agree with Andy it is a transparent way so all community can know this.
>>> Of course I cannot vote, but it is good to know that Daniel is here too
>> :)
>>>
>>> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 15:58, Andy Gumbrecht (<
>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>) va escriure:
>>>
>>>> I started it - Thought it was supposed to be on dev?
>>>>
>>>> On 20/11/2015 15:55, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How so does it happen on dev? Maybe missed something bit this kind of
>>>>> discussion should be done on private.
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 04:31, "Thiago Veronezi" <thiago@veronezi.org
>>>>> <ma...@veronezi.org>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel is an awesome developer with deep JavaEE knowledge along
>>>>> with deep
>>>>> Linux understanding. He will definitely be a great addition to the
>>>>> project.
>>>>> Thank you for all your contributions Daniel!
>>>>>
>>>>> []s,
>>>>> Thiago.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>> <agumbrecht@tomitribe.com <ma...@tomitribe.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to propose that we accept DeltaSpike committer
>>>>> Daniel Cunha
>>>>>> as a committer on the TomEE project.
>>>>>> Dani has been a long time supporter and contributor to the TomEE
>>>>> project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please reposond with a +1, 0, or -1, and any rationale you would
>>>>> like to
>>>>>> provide.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Voting ends one week from today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andy Gumbrecht
>>>> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: New committer process
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Like saying hi when you meet somebody you know ;).
Le 20 nov. 2015 07:53, "Andy" <an...@gmx.de> a écrit :
> So it is optional.
>
> On 20/11/2015 16:36, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
>
>> According to this link
>> (https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html): "Identifying
>> potential new committers, calling a vote for their recognition as a
>> committer and processing the relevant documents is something that the
>> whole
>> community can contribute to."
>>
>> But it also says something about private voting.... "We do the vote on the
>> private mailing list to enable a frank discussion."
>>
>> It looks like the private voting isn't required to become formal, but a
>> good to have if we are not sure about inviting a new committer. I guess
>> this would avoid an awkward "no" during the voting process. (?)
>>
>> []s,
>> Thiago.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Not the way it is generally. Main point is suppose we say no...Daniel
>>> would
>>> leave the project where the no can also mean " let's see a bit more".
>>>
>>> That said such demand generally has some notable contribution on the
>>> project to promote the candidate to help evaluating the guy - we all know
>>> Daniel I guess so it is just a "for next round" comment.
>>>
>>> @pmc: do we keep it there or do we move it to private to stay formal?
>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 06:59, "Alex Soto" <as...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>> I agree with Andy it is a transparent way so all community can know this.
>>>> Of course I cannot vote, but it is good to know that Daniel is here too
>>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>>> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 15:58, Andy Gumbrecht (<
>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>) va escriure:
>>>>
>>>> I started it - Thought it was supposed to be on dev?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20/11/2015 15:55, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How so does it happen on dev? Maybe missed something bit this kind of
>>>>>> discussion should be done on private.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 04:31, "Thiago Veronezi" <thiago@veronezi.org
>>>>>> <ma...@veronezi.org>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel is an awesome developer with deep JavaEE knowledge along
>>>>>> with deep
>>>>>> Linux understanding. He will definitely be a great addition to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> project.
>>>>>> Thank you for all your contributions Daniel!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> []s,
>>>>>> Thiago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>> <agumbrecht@tomitribe.com <ma...@tomitribe.com>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > I would like to propose that we accept DeltaSpike committer
>>>>>> Daniel Cunha
>>>>>> > as a committer on the TomEE project.
>>>>>> > Dani has been a long time supporter and contributor to the
>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>> project.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Please reposond with a +1, 0, or -1, and any rationale you
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> like to
>>>>>> > provide.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Voting ends one week from today.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>> > Andy
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>> > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
> --
> Andy Gumbrecht
> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
>
Re: New committer process
Posted by Andy <an...@gmx.de>.
So it is optional.
On 20/11/2015 16:36, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
> According to this link
> (https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html): "Identifying
> potential new committers, calling a vote for their recognition as a
> committer and processing the relevant documents is something that the whole
> community can contribute to."
>
> But it also says something about private voting.... "We do the vote on the
> private mailing list to enable a frank discussion."
>
> It looks like the private voting isn't required to become formal, but a
> good to have if we are not sure about inviting a new committer. I guess
> this would avoid an awkward "no" during the voting process. (?)
>
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Not the way it is generally. Main point is suppose we say no...Daniel would
>> leave the project where the no can also mean " let's see a bit more".
>>
>> That said such demand generally has some notable contribution on the
>> project to promote the candidate to help evaluating the guy - we all know
>> Daniel I guess so it is just a "for next round" comment.
>>
>> @pmc: do we keep it there or do we move it to private to stay formal?
>> Le 20 nov. 2015 06:59, "Alex Soto" <as...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> I agree with Andy it is a transparent way so all community can know this.
>>> Of course I cannot vote, but it is good to know that Daniel is here too
>> :)
>>> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 15:58, Andy Gumbrecht (<
>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>) va escriure:
>>>
>>>> I started it - Thought it was supposed to be on dev?
>>>>
>>>> On 20/11/2015 15:55, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>> How so does it happen on dev? Maybe missed something bit this kind of
>>>>> discussion should be done on private.
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 04:31, "Thiago Veronezi" <thiago@veronezi.org
>>>>> <ma...@veronezi.org>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel is an awesome developer with deep JavaEE knowledge along
>>>>> with deep
>>>>> Linux understanding. He will definitely be a great addition to the
>>>>> project.
>>>>> Thank you for all your contributions Daniel!
>>>>>
>>>>> []s,
>>>>> Thiago.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>> <agumbrecht@tomitribe.com <ma...@tomitribe.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > I would like to propose that we accept DeltaSpike committer
>>>>> Daniel Cunha
>>>>> > as a committer on the TomEE project.
>>>>> > Dani has been a long time supporter and contributor to the TomEE
>>>>> project.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please reposond with a +1, 0, or -1, and any rationale you would
>>>>> like to
>>>>> > provide.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Voting ends one week from today.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>> > Andy
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>> > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andy Gumbrecht
>>>> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>
>>>>
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe