You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@river.apache.org by Tom Hobbs <tv...@googlemail.com> on 2011/07/05 20:52:28 UTC
Problem with Apache River Release 2.2.0
Hi Infra,
I've been trying to release Apache River 2.2.0 over the past few days
but I seem to have made a pigs ear out of it.
I originally copied the artifacts into a newly created directory on
people.a.o here; /www/www.apache.org/dist/river/2.2.0.
I waited around 24 hours but they never appeared on [1] - also the
"river" never appeared either. So I took a look in a few of the other
project directories and thought I'd made a mistake and there was some
directory naming convention that I'd missed. So I moved them into
/www/www.apache.org/dist/river/river-2.2.0. Waited another 24 hours
but they didn't appear there either.
However, both of these directories can be found on the archive site [2].
So my questions are, what should I have done and can you help me out
of this hole I've dug for myself?
Ideally, I'd like the new artifacts to be available on
www.a.o/dist/river/2.2.0 and for the other directory to disappear
(including from the archive site).
However, in my defense, finding release documentation was remarkably
difficult. I had to rely on bits and pieces scattered around other
project's sites. Did I miss something?
"Help me infrastructure team, you're my only hope." *
Thanks,
Tom
* With apologies to George Lucas, although after the the prequals, I'm
not sure he deserves any...
[1] http://www.apache.org/dist/
[2] http://archive.apache.org/dist/river/
Re: Problem with Apache River Release 2.2.0
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 19/07/2011 09:20, Tom Hobbs wrote:
> I've been on people.a.o and the correct release dir exists in
> /www/www.Apache.org/Dist/river <http://www.Apache.org/Dist/river>
>
> but using a web browser to get to www.a.o/Dist/river just 404s.
>
> Infra@ please can you assist?
This should be fixed now. It will take a couple of hours for the files
to sync. If it is still broken in 4 hours, let us know.
Mark
Re: Problem with Apache River Release 2.2.0
Posted by Tom Hobbs <tv...@googlemail.com>.
I've been on people.a.o and the correct release dir exists in /www/
www.Apache.org/Dist/river
but using a web browser to get to www.a.o/Dist/river just 404s.
Infra@ please can you assist?
Thanks,
Tom
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
mobile device.
On 18 Jul 2011 22:39, "Peter Firmstone" <ji...@zeus.net.au> wrote:
> No I didn't see a response, from memory an old release is moved to the
> archive site, I think moved 2.1.1 to the archive site.
>
> Can you ssh into the server? You might need to cd .. till you get to
> the right directory.
>
> Tom Hobbs wrote:
>> Did anyone see an infra response to this that I missed? I'm still
>> seeing the same problem with our 2.2.0 release.
>>
>> Anyone know how I'm supposed to get the thing out there?
>>
>> Please help.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Tom Hobbs <tv...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Infra,
>>>
>>> I've been trying to release Apache River 2.2.0 over the past few days
>>> but I seem to have made a pigs ear out of it.
>>>
>>> I originally copied the artifacts into a newly created directory on
>>> people.a.o here; /www/www.apache.org/dist/river/2.2.0.
>>>
>>> I waited around 24 hours but they never appeared on [1] - also the
>>> "river" never appeared either. So I took a look in a few of the other
>>> project directories and thought I'd made a mistake and there was some
>>> directory naming convention that I'd missed. So I moved them into
>>> /www/www.apache.org/dist/river/river-2.2.0. Waited another 24 hours
>>> but they didn't appear there either.
>>>
>>> However, both of these directories can be found on the archive site [2].
>>>
>>> So my questions are, what should I have done and can you help me out
>>> of this hole I've dug for myself?
>>>
>>> Ideally, I'd like the new artifacts to be available on
>>> www.a.o/dist/river/2.2.0 and for the other directory to disappear
>>> (including from the archive site).
>>>
>>> However, in my defense, finding release documentation was remarkably
>>> difficult. I had to rely on bits and pieces scattered around other
>>> project's sites. Did I miss something?
>>>
>>> "Help me infrastructure team, you're my only hope." *
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> * With apologies to George Lucas, although after the the prequals, I'm
>>> not sure he deserves any...
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>> [2] http://archive.apache.org/dist/river/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Problem with Apache River Release 2.2.0
Posted by Peter Firmstone <ji...@zeus.net.au>.
No I didn't see a response, from memory an old release is moved to the
archive site, I think moved 2.1.1 to the archive site.
Can you ssh into the server? You might need to cd .. till you get to
the right directory.
Tom Hobbs wrote:
> Did anyone see an infra response to this that I missed? I'm still
> seeing the same problem with our 2.2.0 release.
>
> Anyone know how I'm supposed to get the thing out there?
>
> Please help.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Tom Hobbs <tv...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Infra,
>>
>> I've been trying to release Apache River 2.2.0 over the past few days
>> but I seem to have made a pigs ear out of it.
>>
>> I originally copied the artifacts into a newly created directory on
>> people.a.o here; /www/www.apache.org/dist/river/2.2.0.
>>
>> I waited around 24 hours but they never appeared on [1] - also the
>> "river" never appeared either. So I took a look in a few of the other
>> project directories and thought I'd made a mistake and there was some
>> directory naming convention that I'd missed. So I moved them into
>> /www/www.apache.org/dist/river/river-2.2.0. Waited another 24 hours
>> but they didn't appear there either.
>>
>> However, both of these directories can be found on the archive site [2].
>>
>> So my questions are, what should I have done and can you help me out
>> of this hole I've dug for myself?
>>
>> Ideally, I'd like the new artifacts to be available on
>> www.a.o/dist/river/2.2.0 and for the other directory to disappear
>> (including from the archive site).
>>
>> However, in my defense, finding release documentation was remarkably
>> difficult. I had to rely on bits and pieces scattered around other
>> project's sites. Did I miss something?
>>
>> "Help me infrastructure team, you're my only hope." *
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> * With apologies to George Lucas, although after the the prequals, I'm
>> not sure he deserves any...
>>
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/
>> [2] http://archive.apache.org/dist/river/
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Problem with Apache River Release 2.2.0
Posted by Tom Hobbs <tv...@googlemail.com>.
Did anyone see an infra response to this that I missed? I'm still
seeing the same problem with our 2.2.0 release.
Anyone know how I'm supposed to get the thing out there?
Please help.
Tom
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Tom Hobbs <tv...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Infra,
>
> I've been trying to release Apache River 2.2.0 over the past few days
> but I seem to have made a pigs ear out of it.
>
> I originally copied the artifacts into a newly created directory on
> people.a.o here; /www/www.apache.org/dist/river/2.2.0.
>
> I waited around 24 hours but they never appeared on [1] - also the
> "river" never appeared either. So I took a look in a few of the other
> project directories and thought I'd made a mistake and there was some
> directory naming convention that I'd missed. So I moved them into
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/river/river-2.2.0. Waited another 24 hours
> but they didn't appear there either.
>
> However, both of these directories can be found on the archive site [2].
>
> So my questions are, what should I have done and can you help me out
> of this hole I've dug for myself?
>
> Ideally, I'd like the new artifacts to be available on
> www.a.o/dist/river/2.2.0 and for the other directory to disappear
> (including from the archive site).
>
> However, in my defense, finding release documentation was remarkably
> difficult. I had to rely on bits and pieces scattered around other
> project's sites. Did I miss something?
>
> "Help me infrastructure team, you're my only hope." *
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom
>
> * With apologies to George Lucas, although after the the prequals, I'm
> not sure he deserves any...
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/
> [2] http://archive.apache.org/dist/river/
>