You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ode.apache.org by Matthieu Riou <ma...@offthelip.org> on 2008/09/09 20:19:50 UTC

Renaming bpel-runtime

Hi,

I'm going to rename the bpel-runtime module to simply engine. Makes it
cleaner to have just engine and runtimes.

Cheers,
Matthieu

Re: Renaming bpel-runtime

Posted by Paul Brown <pa...@gmail.com>.

+1.

While we're at it, are there any instances of gratuitous encapsulation  
or modules that should be merged?

On Sep 9, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Matthieu Riou  
> <ma...@offthelip.org>wrote:
>> I'm going to rename the bpel-runtime module to simply engine. Makes  
>> it
>> cleaner to have just engine and runtimes.
> +1

Re: Renaming bpel-runtime

Posted by Matthieu Riou <ma...@offthelip.org>.

Done. Btw if there are other module names that deeply annoy you, might be a
good time to rename them as well. I was contemplating the removal of most
bpel-* prefixes but that might be a bit too drastic.

Matthieu

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Matthieu Riou <matthieu@offthelip.org
> >wrote:
>
> > I'm going to rename the bpel-runtime module to simply engine. Makes it
> > cleaner to have just engine and runtimes.
>
>
> +1
>
> alex
>

Re: Renaming bpel-runtime

Posted by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>.

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Matthieu Riou <ma...@offthelip.org>wrote:

> I'm going to rename the bpel-runtime module to simply engine. Makes it
> cleaner to have just engine and runtimes.


+1

alex