You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Ralph Goers <Ra...@digitalinsight.com> on 2004/05/09 23:08:47 UTC
[VOTE] RE: LogKitLoggerManager
Yes, this change is backward compatible with 2.1.4, but not with the version
Carsten checked in last week. I'd appreciate a vote to have this patch
applied.
Ralph
-----Original Message-----
From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:joerg.heinicke@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 1:52 PM
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: LogKitLoggerManager
On 09.05.2004 19:25, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I've submitted patch 28860. I realize this is after the code freeze, but
I'd
> prefer to see this patch instead of the current code. If 2.1.5 goes out
with
> the current code we would have to maintain the current behavior of
> logger-type.
I guess it's completely backwards compatible (same default behaviour and
so on). Then it can go in, but we must vote about it. It's best if you
start the vote yourself. But IMO we should not wait 72 h for that vote
as we would have only Thursday to test it. 36 h are enough for this case
IMO.
Joerg
Re: [VOTE] RE: LogKitLoggerManager
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
On 09.05.2004 23:08, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Yes, this change is backward compatible with 2.1.4, but not with the version
> Carsten checked in last week. I'd appreciate a vote to have this patch
> applied.
Ok, then +1 from my side.
Joerg
RE: [VOTE] RE: LogKitLoggerManager
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.
+1
Just replace my solution.
Carsten
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:Ralph.Goers@digitalinsight.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 11:09 PM
> To: 'dev@cocoon.apache.org'
> Subject: [VOTE] RE: LogKitLoggerManager
>
> Yes, this change is backward compatible with 2.1.4, but not
> with the version Carsten checked in last week. I'd
> appreciate a vote to have this patch applied.
>
> Ralph
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:joerg.heinicke@gmx.de]
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 1:52 PM
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: LogKitLoggerManager
>
> On 09.05.2004 19:25, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> > I've submitted patch 28860. I realize this is after the
> code freeze,
> > but
> I'd
> > prefer to see this patch instead of the current code. If 2.1.5 goes
> > out
> with
> > the current code we would have to maintain the current behavior of
> > logger-type.
>
> I guess it's completely backwards compatible (same default
> behaviour and so on). Then it can go in, but we must vote
> about it. It's best if you start the vote yourself. But IMO
> we should not wait 72 h for that vote as we would have only
> Thursday to test it. 36 h are enough for this case IMO.
>
> Joerg
>