You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Karl Pauls (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/08/24 22:01:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (FELIX-5912) Handle empty package definitions in system package definitions more gracefully

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Karl Pauls resolved FELIX-5912.
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

I opted to go with your proposal #1 for now (done in r1838974). Still think it is somewhat strange to have no syspkgs whatsoever but syspkg.extra. 

Thank you for reporting!

> Handle empty package definitions in system package definitions more gracefully
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-5912
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5912
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Framework
>    Affects Versions: framework-6.0.1
>            Reporter: Tom Rutchik
>            Assignee: Karl Pauls
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.5h
>
> A felix initiation error can occur if one adds extra "org.osgi.framework.system.package.extras".
> The error produced is caused by a empty package name.
> The problem occurs in the class ExtensionManager in the update(Map configMap) method.
> It contains the following line:
> syspkgs = ((pkgextra == {color:#000080}null{color}) || (pkgextra.trim().length() == {color:#0000ff}0{color}))
>  ? syspkgs : syspkgs + (pkgextra.trim().startsWith({color:#008000}","{color}) ? pkgextra : {color:#008000}"," {color}+ pkgextra);
> When syspkgs has the value "" (the empty string) the result is ",pkgextra".  Syspkgs then gets stored in m_headerMap.  When that header gets parsed later that comma at the beginning of the string gets interpreted as a blank package name and the class ManifestParser method normalizeExportClauses Method throws an exception:
> {color:#000080}else if {color}(pkgName.length() == {color:#0000ff}0{color})
> {
>  {color:#000080}throw new {color}BundleException(
>  {color:#008000}"Exported package names cannot be zero length."{color});
> }
> The result is that the remaining extra packages are not exported.  Other bundles that need these extra packages of course will not be resolved as a result of this exception, and its easy to miss the fact that the exception was thrown during initialization .
> There are two easy solutions to the problem:
> 1.) in the ExtensionManager update manager make the following change (add one line of code):
> syspkgs = ((pkgextra == {color:#000080}null{color}) || (pkgextra.trim().length() == {color:#0000ff}0{color}))
>  ? syspkgs : syspkgs + (pkgextra.trim().startsWith({color:#008000}","{color}) ? pkgextra : {color:#008000}"," {color}+ pkgextra);
> {color:#000080}if {color}(syspkgs.startsWith({color:#008000}","{color})) syspkgs = syspkgs.substring({color:#0000ff}1{color});
> 2.) log an error instead of throwing an exception in the ManifestParser {color:#333333}normalizeExportClauses {color}method and just ignore the blank package name, since it doesn't really cause a problem.
> I've test solution 1 and it solves the problem, but solution 2 is probably a more robust and forgiving solution. 
> Note: this problem doesn't occur if syspkgs is not the empty string. So the problem only occurs under certain configurations.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)