You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Jon Scott Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com> on 2002/03/28 03:44:42 UTC
Digester Rule.digester
Why is Rule.digester protected and not private?
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Digester Rule.digester
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@mac.com>.
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 07:26 PM, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> on 3/28/02 9:39 AM, "robert burrell donkin" <ro...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 02:44 AM, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
>>
>>> Why is Rule.digester protected and not private?
>>
>> backwards compatibility
>>
>> - robert
>
> Can we mark it deprecated and create a new variable?
sounds like a good idea to me :)
i'll take a look next week sometime (if no one else grabs it before then).
- robert
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Digester Rule.digester
Posted by Jon Scott Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 3/28/02 9:39 AM, "robert burrell donkin" <ro...@mac.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 02:44 AM, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
>
>> Why is Rule.digester protected and not private?
>
> backwards compatibility
>
> - robert
Can we mark it deprecated and create a new variable?
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Digester Rule.digester
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@mac.com>.
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 02:44 AM, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> Why is Rule.digester protected and not private?
backwards compatibility
- robert
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>