You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tiles.apache.org by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/27 15:53:06 UTC
Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Hi all!
I wish to forward a private discussion between me and David about the
release of Tiles 2.0.1.
For the moment I will update the site with links to the 2.0.1 (since
it is already mirrored).
We should start thinking on a 2.0.2 release, since Struts 1
integration code uses an unpublished version of Tiles 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT,
see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg27951.html
My only doubt is if the "assembly" module is ok for everyone to be
used to publish a release.
Thoughts?
Ciao
Antonio
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org>
Date: 27-mar-2007 14.33
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.0.1 status
To: Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>
I'd love it. I think I have everything uploaded and all that needs to
be done is polish the website push out the announcement. I've done some
website tweaks, but I really wanted to do some more before I announced
our first release.
As far as I'm concerned (especially in light of recent struts
discussions about a potential 2.0.2 release) it may be a good idea to
keep 2.0.1 quiet (no announcement) and just start working on 2.0.2.
Thoughts?
David
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Hi David,
> I would like to know what is the status of 2.0.1 release since I
> *finally* settled my home machine.
> If you still have some steps to do, I would like to help.
>
> Ciao
> Antonio
>
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2007/3/27, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
> That worked better, but still not quite perfectly I still got the exception
> (see below), but it genereated apidocs and dtddocs. I'll try to track down
> the cause of the exception and see if I can fix it.
Mmm... I tried removing all the maven local repository and it worked well...
> Let's roll it :-)
Ok I will start preparing the release ASAP.
Antonio
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
On 3/27/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2007/3/27, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
> > Ok I got it. I'm not on my normal computer right now so I checked out
> > "current". That gave me a directory with subdirs of examples,
> framework,
> > maven, and site. First, I went into framework and did "mvn clean
> install".
> > Worked fine. Then I went into site and did "mvn install site". That
> blew
> > up with a NoClassDefFoundError.
>
> Sorry, I meant that you need to go to "framework" and type:
> mvn clean install site
> So it generates javadocs, tlddocs and dtddocs.
That worked better, but still not quite perfectly I still got the exception
(see below), but it genereated apidocs and dtddocs. I'll try to track down
the cause of the exception and see if I can fix it.
>From a pragmatic standpoint I'd say the assembly looks good - assuming I can
get past my build issue. It looks like I might have a bad version of a
plugin installed or something. Here's the error:
[INFO] Preparing surefire-report:report-only
[INFO] No goals needed for project - skipping
[INFO] [site:site]
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] org/codehaus/plexus/util/FileUtils
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Trace
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/codehaus/plexus/util/FileUtils
at net.sf.maventaglib.TaglibdocMojo.canGenerateReport(
TaglibdocMojo.java:211)
at org.apache.maven.plugins.site.SiteMojo.filterReports(
SiteMojo.java:409)
at org.apache.maven.plugins.site.SiteMojo.execute(SiteMojo.java:221)
at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(
DefaultPluginManager.java:420)
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(
DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:539)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle
(DefaultLifecycleExecut
or.java:480)
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(
DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:459)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures
(DefaultLifecycleEx
ecutor.java:311)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(
DefaultLifecycleExecutor.ja
va:278)
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(
DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:143)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:330)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:123)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:272)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java
:315)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java
:430)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
Let's roll it :-)
Greg
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2007/3/27, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
> Ok I got it. I'm not on my normal computer right now so I checked out
> "current". That gave me a directory with subdirs of examples, framework,
> maven, and site. First, I went into framework and did "mvn clean install".
> Worked fine. Then I went into site and did "mvn install site". That blew
> up with a NoClassDefFoundError.
Sorry, I meant that you need to go to "framework" and type:
mvn clean install site
So it generates javadocs, tlddocs and dtddocs.
Antonio
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
On 3/27/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Errr sorry I forgot a bit of things!
> Go inside the "tiles" parent directory and type:
>
> mvn install site
>
> > And then go inside the "assembly" directory and type:
> > mvn assembly:assembly
Ok I got it. I'm not on my normal computer right now so I checked out
"current". That gave me a directory with subdirs of examples, framework,
maven, and site. First, I went into framework and did "mvn clean install".
Worked fine. Then I went into site and did "mvn install site". That blew
up with a NoClassDefFoundError. I haven't tried to investigate that yet.
So I went into framework/assembly and did "mvn assembly:assembly" and it
built the assemblies.
I have 4 assemblies: a zip and a tar.gz each for src and binary. They all
look to be in good shape to me, containing most of the useful artifacts.
The only thing that's not in the assemblies is the doc. Is that just
because of the exception I mentioned above or is that something that needs
to be added?
Greg
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
Errr sorry I forgot a bit of things!
Go inside the "tiles" parent directory and type:
mvn install site
> And then go inside the "assembly" directory and type:
> mvn assembly:assembly
Antonio
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2007/3/27, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
> On 3/27/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I used the wrong terms, I meant "assemblies the packages together".
> > The assembly module depends on tiles-core, tiles-api and tiles-jsp,
> > takes it altogether and builds the source and binary distributions.
>
>
> I wanted to try it and see how it works. I went into the framework
> directory and did "mvn clean install". It says it built the assembly
> module, but all it did is place a pom.xml file in my repo. How do I
> actually build the assembly?
Type:
mvn site
And then go inside the "assembly" directory and type:
mvn assembly:assembly
Anyway I committed a "how to build" page, so in the next site
publishing it will appear.
HTH
Antonio
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
On 3/27/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry I used the wrong terms, I meant "assemblies the packages together".
> The assembly module depends on tiles-core, tiles-api and tiles-jsp,
> takes it altogether and builds the source and binary distributions.
I wanted to try it and see how it works. I went into the framework
directory and did "mvn clean install". It says it built the assembly
module, but all it did is place a pom.xml file in my repo. How do I
actually build the assembly?
Sorry for my ignorance :-)
Greg
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2007/3/27, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org>:
>
>
> Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > I wanted to mimic how Struts 1 and 2 build releases.
>
> EEEk. That comment scares me. I'd much rather use mvn release plugin
> than have to do all the manual steps struts has to do.
Sorry I used the wrong terms, I meant "assemblies the packages together".
The assembly module depends on tiles-core, tiles-api and tiles-jsp,
takes it altogether and builds the source and binary distributions.
Did I do something wrong?
Antonio
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2007/3/27, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
>> My only doubt is if the "assembly" module is ok for everyone to be
>> > used to publish a release.
>>
>>
>> I don't know anything about that.
>
> See:
> http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/TILES-127
>
> I wanted to mimic how Struts 1 and 2 build releases.
EEEk. That comment scares me. I'd much rather use mvn release plugin
than have to do all the manual steps struts has to do.
>
> Antonio
>
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2007/3/27, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>:
> My only doubt is if the "assembly" module is ok for everyone to be
> > used to publish a release.
>
>
> I don't know anything about that.
See:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/TILES-127
I wanted to mimic how Struts 1 and 2 build releases.
Antonio
Re: Tiles 2.0.2 (WAS: Fwd: Tiles 2.0.1 status)
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
On 3/27/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We should start thinking on a 2.0.2 release, since Struts 1
> integration code uses an unpublished version of Tiles 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT,
+1.
Is there an almost definitive list somewhere that shows what we need to do
to reach GA status for 2.0.x? I've been suspecting a new release to come
soon so I haven't upgraded Shale-Tiles support yet. I'd love for us to get
on the fast track to a release the general public can start using.
My only doubt is if the "assembly" module is ok for everyone to be
> used to publish a release.
I don't know anything about that.
Greg