Re: email to user's mailing list bounced back?

[Bryan Call <bc...@apache.org>]

You might not have been subscribed to the mailing list.  I do see your email made it to the list.  I might have approved it and since I see a lot of spam/emails to approve I don’t remember if I approved this one.

-Bryan

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 7:14 AM, Ye, Hong <Ho...@comcast.com> wrote:
> 
> Not sure what is going on … my email to users@trafficserver.apache.org was kicked back.
> Any idea?
> 
> ======================================
> 
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
> 
> <us...@trafficserver.apache.org>:
> Must be sent from an @apache.org address or a subscriber address or an address in LDAP.
> 
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
> 
> Return-Path: <Ho...@comcast.com>
> Received: (qmail 94368 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2016 15:10:11 -0000
> Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
>    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:10:11 +0000
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> 	by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6375F180254;
> 	Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:10:10 +0000 (UTC)
> X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org
> X-Spam-Flag: NO
> X-Spam-Score: -2.999
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
> 	tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
> 	autolearn=disabled
> Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
> 	by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
> 	with ESMTP id pNgEsotiljYb; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:10:06 +0000 (UTC)
> Received: from vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com [96.114.28.75])
> 	by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D56FF5F2F1;
> 	Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
> X-AuditID: 60721c4b-1f3ff700000045be-22-58500f098e3b
> Received: from VAADCEX44.cable.comcast.com (vaadcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.115.73.56])
> 	(using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits))
> 	(Client did not present a certificate)
> 	by  (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 36.8F.17854.90F00585; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:08:59 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from VAADCEX48.cable.comcast.com (147.191.103.225) by
> VAADCEX44.cable.comcast.com (147.191.103.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server
> (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:08:56 -0500
> Received: from VAADCEX48.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:5e40]) by
> VAADCEX48.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:5e40%19]) with mapi id
> 15.00.1130.005; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:08:56 -0500
> 
> ======================================
> On 12/13/16, 10:08 AM, "Ye, Hong" <Ho...@comcast.com> wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
> 
>    I need some help to figure out the right way to log URL redirect request. I am using “redirect” and “regex_remap” rules like below:
> 
>    redirect http://comcast.net http://www.comcast.net
>    map http://mytest.com http://www.comcast.com/m @plugin=/usr/lib64/trafficserver/regex_remap.so @pparam=/etc/trafficserver/regexmap/mytest.com.reg
> 
>    Here is my logging configuration. Basically, I want to log the request and return target. (The redirect itself had no problem)
> 
>    <LogFormat>
>        <Name = "urlrw"/>
>        <Format = "%<cqtd> %<cqtt> %<chi> %<pssc> %<cfsc> %<cqus>://%<shn>/%<cqup> %<{Location}psh>"/>
>    </LogFormat>
>    <LogObject>
>        <Format = "urlrw"/>
>        <Filename = "urlrw.log"/>
>        <Mode = "ascii"/>
>        <Protocols = "http"/>
>        <RollingEnabled = "1"/>
>        <RollingIntervalSec ="43200"/>
>    </LogObject>
> 
>    For the redirect rule, I got what I want:
> 
>    2016-12-13 15:07:03 10.21.98.110 301 FIN http://comcast.net/- http://www.comcast.net/
> 
>    But for the “map” rule, I got following:
> 
>    2016-12-13 14:58:08 10.21.98.110 301 FIN http://www.google.com/- http://www.google.com/.
> 
>    I am using ATS6.2.0. Did I miss something or is there a problem with ATS? Any idea?
> 
>    Thanks
> 
>    Hong
> 
> 
> 
> 
>