You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by "Andy Seaborne (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/04/12 17:48:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1695) Refactory database storage for TDB2.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16816525#comment-16816525 ] 

Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1695:
-------------------------------------

Work on this is finished. It's too near to 3.11.0 now.

There will be two commits:

# Add module jena-dboe-storage, with current TDB1 and TDB2 adapted to some of classes and renamings does as part of the work. Neither TDB is using the storage abstraction.
# Replace jena-tdb2 with a version that does use the storage abstraction. The on-disk format is unchanged.

TDB1 remains with it current way of working.

> Refactory database storage for TDB2.
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1695
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1695
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DBOE
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.11.0
>            Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: Jena 3.12.0
>
>
> This ticket is for a new module (provisionally called "jena-db-storage") that is a framework for building RDF databases. It abstracts the database in to "triples+quads", "prefixes" and transactional control.
> {noformat}
> public interface DatabaseRDF  {
>     // Triples and Quads
>     public StorageRDF getData();
>     // Prefixes
>     public StoragePrefixes getPrefixes();
>     //Transactional} for this database.
>     public Transactional getTransactional();
> }
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)