You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@logging.apache.org by German Gonzalez-Morris <ge...@gmail.com> on 2019/04/18 21:51:04 UTC
JDK version for building
Hello,
As we all know, JDK9 is deprecated, which version of JDK are you using to
build log4j2 from sources ?
Regards,
German Gonzalez-Morris
----
``Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es realmente necesario''
``Before printing think about the Environment''
Re: JDK version for building
Posted by Carter Kozak <ck...@ckozak.net>.
I've been doing the same successfully for local builds and testing, though I haven't verified that the bytecode is generated targeting java 9.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019, at 00:10, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I set up my local toolchain config file with java 8 and 11. There’s a bug
> in pom.xml currently where you need to add a duplicate entry for java 11 as
> version 9. In theory, you could just use java 11 to compile everything.
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 17:57, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure what the concern here is. We build releases using Java 7
> > for most of the Log4j build and build with Java 9 for certain components
> > that require features that were added there. Log4j 2 2.x is supported on
> > Java 7 and above.
> >
> > Log4j 2.3.0, which is still under development, will require a minimum of
> > Java 8.
> >
> > Is there a concern here that I am missing?
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > On Apr 18, 2019, at 2:51 PM, German Gonzalez-Morris <
> > german.gonzalez@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > As we all know, JDK9 is deprecated, which version of JDK are you using to
> > > build log4j2 from sources ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > German Gonzalez-Morris
> > >
> > > ----
> > >
> > > ``Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es realmente necesario''
> > > ``Before printing think about the Environment''
> >
> >
> > --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
Re: JDK version for building
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
I set up my local toolchain config file with java 8 and 11. There’s a bug
in pom.xml currently where you need to add a duplicate entry for java 11 as
version 9. In theory, you could just use java 11 to compile everything.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 17:57, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
> I am not sure what the concern here is. We build releases using Java 7
> for most of the Log4j build and build with Java 9 for certain components
> that require features that were added there. Log4j 2 2.x is supported on
> Java 7 and above.
>
> Log4j 2.3.0, which is still under development, will require a minimum of
> Java 8.
>
> Is there a concern here that I am missing?
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Apr 18, 2019, at 2:51 PM, German Gonzalez-Morris <
> german.gonzalez@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > As we all know, JDK9 is deprecated, which version of JDK are you using to
> > build log4j2 from sources ?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > German Gonzalez-Morris
> >
> > ----
> >
> > ``Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es realmente necesario''
> > ``Before printing think about the Environment''
>
>
> --
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
Re: JDK version for building
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
I am not sure what the concern here is. We build releases using Java 7 for most of the Log4j build and build with Java 9 for certain components that require features that were added there. Log4j 2 2.x is supported on Java 7 and above.
Log4j 2.3.0, which is still under development, will require a minimum of Java 8.
Is there a concern here that I am missing?
Ralph
> On Apr 18, 2019, at 2:51 PM, German Gonzalez-Morris <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As we all know, JDK9 is deprecated, which version of JDK are you using to
> build log4j2 from sources ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> German Gonzalez-Morris
>
> ----
>
> ``Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es realmente necesario''
> ``Before printing think about the Environment''
Re: JDK version for building
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
I need Java 8 and Java 9 in our Maven toolchain to build Log4j 2. You could
use later versions, maybe, I've not tried it.
Gary
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 5:51 PM German Gonzalez-Morris <
german.gonzalez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As we all know, JDK9 is deprecated, which version of JDK are you using to
> build log4j2 from sources ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> German Gonzalez-Morris
>
> ----
>
> ``Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es realmente necesario''
> ``Before printing think about the Environment''
>