You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tamaya.apache.org by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net> on 2015/12/09 11:18:13 UTC

Fixing the build

Hi guys,

I will fix the brocken build tomorrow. Currently Maven is not able to 
build the module with the common configurations for CheckStyle etc. 
first. I think the reason for this is the removal of the Java 8 specific 
modules and the restructuring the modules by moving api, core and 
modules to the root directory of the project.

Suggested solution is the move these modules to a subdirectory called 
code. Then Maven will be able to build all modules in the correct order.

Bye

Oliver

-- 
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf

Re: Fixing the build

Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.

So that would be Santamaya ;-D

Werner



l
<https://about.me/wernerkeil?promo=email_sig>


On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 for 0.x release for Xmas ;)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-12-18 9:10 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Awsome! I wll update some docs nexr days. From a functionality
> perspective
> > we are ready for a next release I think. At least there are no
> ideas/plans
> > from my side to add anything more (perhaps some testing and one or two
> > examples)...
> >
> > Cheers
> > Anatole
> > Am 18.12.2015 09:00 schrieb "Oliver B. Fischer" <
> o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > >:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I will fix the build over the weekend.
> > >
> > > Bye,
> > >
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > > Am 13.12.15 um 22:24 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> > >
> > >> Le 13 déc. 2015 22:13, "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>
> a
> > >> écrit :
> > >>
> > >>> Sorry, absolutly not. Before someone removed all stuff I added I
> found
> > a
> > >>>
> > >> lot of stuff. For example a lot of SPI implementations not configured
> as
> > >> SPI.
> > >>
> > >>> Sorry, absolutly not. And sometimes I am a little bit shocked as I
> > >>>
> > >> expected to find here more pros. Sorry, but something might be wrong
> if
> > I
> > >> can work at work more like a pro than in a Apache project.
> > >> Look tomcat findbugs commits, prooves this tool is great when you have
> > >> time
> > >> but mainly gives false positives on *modern* programming. Your spi
> issue
> > >> shows a lack of tests which is, this time, a pro criteria.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Am 13.12.15 um 21:21 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> > >>>
> > >>> What about making findbugs plugin supporting inline config instead?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Side note: I personally think this doesnt increase the quality of
> the
> > >>>> project bit encourages to give a wrong image of it. I'd be +1 to
> drop
> > it
> > >>>> from the main project.
> > >>>> Le 13 déc. 2015 21:12, "Oliver B. Fischer" <
> o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net>
> > a
> > >>>> écrit :
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Inline configuration is only possible for Checkstyle, but not for
> > >>>>> FindBugs, also used by us. The structure I suggest is also
> suggested
> > by
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> the
> > >>
> > >>> guys from FindBugs:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>
> >
> http://gleclaire.github.io/findbugs-maven-plugin/examples/multi-module-config.html
> > >>
> > >>> If no one objects I will start on Tuesday to implement this
> structure.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Bye,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Oliver
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Am 09.12.15 um 11:26 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> adding them as dependency in scope test in other modules should
> make
> > it
> > >>>>>> working (but is ugly and only works if install is executed) but
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> checkstyle
> > >>
> > >>> config can be inlined in parent pom so we can get rid of a module for
> > >>>>>> checkstyle. Alternative is to move style config in a module not in
> > the
> > >>>>>> main
> > >>>>>> project, release both for next release and just use the released
> > >>>>>> module
> > >>>>>> then.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > >>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > >>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > >>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2015-12-09 11:18 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer <
> > >>>>>> o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> :
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi guys,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I will fix the brocken build tomorrow. Currently Maven is not
> able
> > to
> > >>>>>>> build the module with the common configurations for CheckStyle
> etc.
> > >>>>>>> first.
> > >>>>>>> I think the reason for this is the removal of the Java 8 specific
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> modules
> > >>
> > >>> and the restructuring the modules by moving api, core and modules to
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>
> > >>> root directory of the project.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Suggested solution is the move these modules to a subdirectory
> > called
> > >>>>>>> code. Then Maven will be able to build all modules in the correct
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> order.
> > >>
> > >>> Bye
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Oliver
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> N Oliver B. Fischer
> > >>>>>>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> > >>>>>>> P +49 30 44793251
> > >>>>>>> M +49 178 7903538
> > >>>>>>> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > >>>>>>> S oliver.b.fischer
> > >>>>>>> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> > >>>>>>> X http://xing.to/obf
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>> N Oliver B. Fischer
> > >>>>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> > >>>>> P +49 30 44793251
> > >>>>> M +49 178 7903538
> > >>>>> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > >>>>> S oliver.b.fischer
> > >>>>> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> > >>>>> X http://xing.to/obf
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>> N Oliver B. Fischer
> > >>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> > >>> P +49 30 44793251
> > >>> M +49 178 7903538
> > >>> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > >>> S oliver.b.fischer
> > >>> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> > >>> X http://xing.to/obf
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > > --
> > > N Oliver B. Fischer
> > > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> > > P +49 30 44793251
> > > M +49 178 7903538
> > > E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > > S oliver.b.fischer
> > > J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> > > X http://xing.to/obf
> > >
> > >
> >
>