You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@juddi.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ju...@ws.apache.org> on 2013/12/27 00:53:50 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (JUDDI-637) Add source code documentation to UDDIClerk, UDDIClient, UDDIService and more

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13857163#comment-13857163 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JUDDI-637:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1553604 from [~kstam] in branch 'juddi/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1553604 ]

JUDDI-637, adding javadoc and refactoring the juddi-client code so it is more user friendly.

> Add source code documentation to UDDIClerk, UDDIClient, UDDIService and more
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JUDDI-637
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-637
>             Project: jUDDI
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: uddi-client
>            Reporter: Alex O'Ree
>            Assignee: Kurt T Stam
>             Fix For: 3.2
>
>
> The current juddi-client source tree is really lacking in source code documentation. Specifically the following classes
> UDDIClerk
> UDDIClient
> UDDIService
> UDDINode
> WebHelper
> JUDDIRegistry
> EmbeddedRegistry
> UDDIServiceCache
> and probably more.
> At the least, we should have class level and public function javadoc info provided, such as usage scenarios, descriptions, sample code, etc



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)