You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by Carl von Loesch <ly...@net.pages.de> on 1997/11/26 13:56:38 UTC

documentation/1485: Example should use a 301 permanent redirect

>Number:         1485
>Category:       documentation
>Synopsis:       Example should use a 301 permanent redirect
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          open
>Class:          mistaken
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Nov 26 06:10:01 PST 1997
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     lynx@net.pages.de
>Organization:
apache
>Release:        
>Environment:
The Web
>Description:
http://www.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_asis.html shows an example
of an .asis redirection which is a clear candidate for 301, not 302.

It's no problem of course, I'm just interested in raising the
awareness of the existence of cachable redirection.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]