You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Andrew Wang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/01 20:05:42 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-6782) Improve FS editlog logSync

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Wang updated HDFS-6782:
------------------------------

    Affects Version/s:     (was: 3.0.0)
                       2.4.1

> Improve FS editlog logSync
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6782
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6782
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Yi Liu
>            Assignee: Yi Liu
>         Attachments: HDFS-6782.001.patch
>
>
> In NN, it uses a double buffer (bufCurrent, bufReady) for log sync, bufCurrent it to buffer new coming edit ops and bufReady is for flushing. This's efficient. When flush is ongoing, and bufCurrent is full, NN goes to force log sync, and all new Ops are blocked (since force log sync is protected by FSNameSystem write lock). After the flush finished, the new Ops are still blocked, but actually at this time, bufCurrent is free and Ops can go ahead and write to the buffer. The following diagram shows the detail. This JIRA is for this improvement.  Thanks [~umamaheswararao] for confirming this issue.
> {code}
> edit1(txid1) ------ write to bufCurrent -------- logSync --------- (swap buffer)flushing -------
> edit2(txid2) ------ write to bufCurrent -------- logSync --------- waiting -------
> edit3(txid3) ------ write to bufCurrent -------- logSync --------- waiting -------
> edit4(txid4) ------ write to bufCurrent -------- logSync --------- waiting -------
> edit5(txid5) ------ write to bufCurrent --full-- force sync --------- waiting -------
> edit6(txid6) ------ blocked
> ...
> editn(txidn) ------ blocked
> {code}
> After the flush, it becomes
> {code}
> edit1(txid1) ------ write to bufCurrent -------- logSync --------- finished --------
> edit2(txid2) ------ write to bufCurrent -------- logSync --------- flushing -------
> edit3(txid3) ------ write to bufCurrent -------- logSync --------- waiting -------
> edit4(txid4) ------ write to bufCurrent -------- logSync --------- waiting -------
> edit5(txid5) ------ write to bufCurrent --full-- force sync --------- waiting -------
> edit6(txid6) ------ blocked
> ...
> editn(txidn) ------ blocked
> {code}
> After edit1 finished, bufCurrent is free, and the thread which flushes txid2 will also flushes txid3-5, so we should return from the force sync of edit5 and FSNamesystem write lock will be freed (Don't worry that edit5 Op will return, since there will be a normal logSync after the force logSync and there will wait for sync finished). This is the idea of this JIRA. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)