You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/02/05 04:15:05 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16344] - DynaActionForm does not seem to support "map-backed" form beans

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16344>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16344

DynaActionForm does not seem to support "map-backed" form beans

husted@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID
            Summary|DynaActionForm does not seem|DynaActionForm does not seem
                   |to support "map-backed" form|to support "map-backed" form
                   |beans                       |beans



------- Additional Comments From husted@apache.org  2003-02-05 03:15 -------
It might be better to bring this up on the USER list first before entering an
unspecified enhancement. You might want to try and construct a test case that
demonstrates what you expect. 

Personally, I'm not clear on why you would want to combine a map-backed and
DynaActionForm. DynaBeans are already map-backed. But, again, you might want to
discusss this on the USER list.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org