You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Mike Matrigali (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/06/11 23:12:45 UTC
[jira] Updated: (DERBY-3683) SYSCS_COMPRESS_TABLE gets deadlock
while executing concurrently with other user threads
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-3683:
----------------------------------
Summary: SYSCS_COMPRESS_TABLE gets deadlock while executing concurrently with other user threads (was: SYSCS_COMPRESS_TABLE fails to aquire exclusive table lock)
> SYSCS_COMPRESS_TABLE gets deadlock while executing concurrently with other user threads
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3683
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3683
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 10.4.1.3
> Environment: Embedded Derby, Sun JDK 1.6.0_06-b02, Linux 2.6.9-67.0.15.EL i686
> Reporter: Juha Heljoranta
> Priority: Minor
>
> Derby documentation about SYSCS_COMPRESS_TABLE says: "...procedure acquires an exclusive table lock on the table being compressed." However, I get:
> java.sql.SQLException: The exception 'java.sql.SQLException: A lock could not be obtained due to a deadlock, cycle of locks and waiters is:
> Lock : ROW, SYSCONGLOMERATES, (7,16)
> Waiting XID : {13091, X} , APP, alter table "APP"."XYZ" compress sequential
> Granted XID : {13091, S} , {13087, S}
> Lock : TABLE, XYZ, Tablelock
> Waiting XID : {13087, IX} , APP, update XYZ set FOO = ? where BAR = ? AND ID = ?
> Granted XID : {13091, X}
> . The selected victim is XID : 13091.' was thrown while evaluating an expression.
> if another thread is updating the same table while another thread executes:
> CallableStatement cs = conn.prepareCall("CALL SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_COMPRESS_TABLE(?, ?, ?)");
> cs.setString(1, "APP");
> cs.setString(2, "XYZ");
> cs.setShort(3, (short) 1);
> cs.execute();
> conn.commit();
> Problem goes away if I acquire exclusive table lock manually right before the compress table statement:
> conn.prepareStatement("LOCK TABLE XYZ IN EXCLUSIVE MODE").executeUpdate();
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.