You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@ace.apache.org by "J.W. Janssen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/01/28 11:56:39 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (ACE-523) Client REST API does not interpret same filters as Gogo commands

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

J.W. Janssen updated ACE-523:
-----------------------------
    Labels: ace-next  (was: )

> Client REST API does not interpret same filters as Gogo commands
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACE-523
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-523
>             Project: ACE
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client Repository
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>            Reporter: J.W. Janssen
>            Assignee: J.W. Janssen
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: ace-next
>
> When creating an association using the Gogo commands, you can specify a cardinality of {{N}} as shortcut for {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}}. This does not work when creating associations through the REST API. This is trivial to add to make both APIs work in a similar manner.
> In addition, the REST API allows you to specify {{left}} and {{right}} as alternative for {{leftEndpoint}} and {{rightEndpoint}}. Not sure what the exact meaning of this is and why this isn't implemented in the Gogo commands...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)