You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> on 2014/04/04 22:42:54 UTC
[Andorid] Why does LOG exist?
I'm currently working on CB-4404 again and I'm wondering why we use
LOG instead of the Android Log methods. This just seems like we're
duplicating code for no reason. Does anyone know why we do this, and
if we can get rid of this class? I believe this was an IBM thing, so
any old-time IBMers can probably answer this one.
Joe
Re: [Andorid] Why does LOG exist?
Posted by Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com>.
No idea, ran into this issue a few weeks ago, it's confusing and doesn't
seem to add any usefulness. I don't think any of those old IBMers are still
working on the project. We could probably track down Simon, or just rip it
out.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Yep, I certainly have no idea.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm currently working on CB-4404 again and I'm wondering why we use
> > LOG instead of the Android Log methods. This just seems like we're
> > duplicating code for no reason. Does anyone know why we do this, and
> > if we can get rid of this class? I believe this was an IBM thing, so
> > any old-time IBMers can probably answer this one.
> >
> > Joe
> >
>
Re: [Andorid] Why does LOG exist?
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
Yep, I certainly have no idea.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm currently working on CB-4404 again and I'm wondering why we use
> LOG instead of the Android Log methods. This just seems like we're
> duplicating code for no reason. Does anyone know why we do this, and
> if we can get rid of this class? I believe this was an IBM thing, so
> any old-time IBMers can probably answer this one.
>
> Joe
>