You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2015/05/29 17:07:19 UTC
getting a software grant for the cas-obj submissions, and doing IP
clearance
Hi,
Because I'm beginning to like the various trade-offs embodied in much of the
Cas-Obj proposal, in order to work with more easily, I'd like to get it into a
spot in our SVN.
To enable doing this, I'd like to ask Nick H. to provide a software grant for
it, and do the IP - clearance for it.
Before I proceed along this path, does anyone have other opinions on this as a
next step?
-Marshall
Re: getting a software grant for the cas-obj submissions, and doing
IP clearance
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Nope, I think that the right way to proceed...
Peter
Am 29.05.2015 um 17:07 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Hi,
>
> Because I'm beginning to like the various trade-offs embodied in much of the
> Cas-Obj proposal, in order to work with more easily, I'd like to get it into a
> spot in our SVN.
>
> To enable doing this, I'd like to ask Nick H. to provide a software grant for
> it, and do the IP - clearance for it.
>
> Before I proceed along this path, does anyone have other opinions on this as a
> next step?
>
> -Marshall
Re: getting a software grant for the cas-obj submissions, and doing
IP clearance
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
OK. So Nick, please get the company lawyers to do a Corporate Contributor
License Agreement (CCLA) or an Apache Software Grant for this.
Here's a short description of these https://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas ; read
the sections on Contributor License Agreements (CLA) (where it talks about the
Corporate CLA (Contributor License Agreement) and the Software Grant; there are
links to both forms.
Of these two alternative forms, I would suggest you get your company to do the
CCLA (which includes a Software Grant form) - that way, you get them to document
that they're allowing you in particular to work on UIMA things in open source.
Once this is received, we'll do the IP clearance and move this into an SVN spot.
Also, please do a personal CLA. Thanks!
-Marshall
On 5/29/2015 12:53 PM, Nick Hill wrote:
> Sounds good to me. Regardless of whether it ultimately gets "adopted" I think
> having it in SVN will make it easier to collaboratively experiment with /
> evolve the prototype.
> I do plan to continue to contribute but may not have as much time to spend on
> it as I have done in the past (at least in the near future).
>
> In terms of functional parity with current UIMA, the only significant
> remaining gaps I think are:
> - Delta CAS support
> - Index "auto-protection"
> - Some multi-classloader related stuff maybe
>
> Of course the smaller TODOs including cleanup add up to quite a lot too, and I
> expect we may want to experiment with different variations of particular
> aspects of the impl.
>
> Regards,
> Nick
>
> Quoting Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>:
>
>> That is a good next step.
>>
>> @Nick: what do you think? And... do you plan to continue working on this code?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -- Richard
>>
>> On 29.05.2015, at 17:07, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Because I'm beginning to like the various trade-offs embodied in much of the
>>> Cas-Obj proposal, in order to work with more easily, I'd like to get it into a
>>> spot in our SVN.
>>>
>>> To enable doing this, I'd like to ask Nick H. to provide a software grant for
>>> it, and do the IP - clearance for it.
>>>
>>> Before I proceed along this path, does anyone have other opinions on this as a
>>> next step?
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>
>
>
Re: getting a software grant for the cas-obj submissions, and doing
IP clearance
Posted by Nick Hill <ap...@nickhill.org>.
Sounds good to me. Regardless of whether it ultimately gets "adopted"
I think having it in SVN will make it easier to collaboratively
experiment with / evolve the prototype.
I do plan to continue to contribute but may not have as much time to
spend on it as I have done in the past (at least in the near future).
In terms of functional parity with current UIMA, the only significant
remaining gaps I think are:
- Delta CAS support
- Index "auto-protection"
- Some multi-classloader related stuff maybe
Of course the smaller TODOs including cleanup add up to quite a lot
too, and I expect we may want to experiment with different variations
of particular aspects of the impl.
Regards,
Nick
Quoting Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>:
> That is a good next step.
>
> @Nick: what do you think? And... do you plan to continue working on
> this code?
>
> Best,
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 29.05.2015, at 17:07, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Because I'm beginning to like the various trade-offs embodied in much of the
>> Cas-Obj proposal, in order to work with more easily, I'd like to
>> get it into a
>> spot in our SVN.
>>
>> To enable doing this, I'd like to ask Nick H. to provide a software
>> grant for
>> it, and do the IP - clearance for it.
>>
>> Before I proceed along this path, does anyone have other opinions
>> on this as a
>> next step?
>>
>> -Marshall
Re: getting a software grant for the cas-obj submissions, and doing IP clearance
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
That is a good next step.
@Nick: what do you think? And... do you plan to continue working on this code?
Best,
-- Richard
On 29.05.2015, at 17:07, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Because I'm beginning to like the various trade-offs embodied in much of the
> Cas-Obj proposal, in order to work with more easily, I'd like to get it into a
> spot in our SVN.
>
> To enable doing this, I'd like to ask Nick H. to provide a software grant for
> it, and do the IP - clearance for it.
>
> Before I proceed along this path, does anyone have other opinions on this as a
> next step?
>
> -Marshall