You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net> on 2003/12/17 08:29:10 UTC
POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Hi,
When looking at the posts on this threads, I see that this is the status
so far about commiting the changes:
r8009 +1 kfogel
0
-1
r8010 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
0
-1
r8011 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
0
-1
About r8009:
I'm +1 on it (but that don't count as my commit access are partial). So
If we applies the 1.0 release rules on 0.35.0 (which posting on this
thread suggests) then r8009 will not be merged.
One thing to notice is that all of you are talking about r8009 issues,
but only Karl votes. May I have your votes for r8009 please? :-)
I will hold the merge for r8010 and r8011 until my evening (CET) and see
if r8009 get some more votes or not (I have a feeling that r8009 just
slipped away) :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net>.
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 05:02, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> > I thought Karl was urging us to wait until Friday before voting. FWIW, I
> > +1
> > r8009 as well.
>
> He did, but we can't include this in 0.35.0 if we vote after the
> release....
Aha! Missed that. Thanks Erik.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by Erik Huelsmann <e....@gmx.net>.
> I thought Karl was urging us to wait until Friday before voting. FWIW, I
> +1
> r8009 as well.
He did, but we can't include this in 0.35.0 if we vote after the release....
bye,
Erik.
--
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net>.
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 15:19, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net> writes:
> > I thought Karl was urging us to wait until Friday before voting. FWIW, I
> > +1 r8009 as well.
>
> Yes, in general. The current time is a bit slippery because it's
> about both the 0.35.0 release and the 1.0 release. Even if 1.0 were
> not coming soon, though, these changes would have been appropriate for
> any interim release that was still in its "soak" period, that's why I
> +1'd them. And, after all, they are crash fixes :-).
Sorry, I wasn't questioning your judgement... after all, I gave it a +1 as
well. I thought you were seeking some sort of coordination on our part to
make it easier to count votes, or something along those lines. I didn't
realize that there was a seperate vote going on already for 0.35.0 stuff.
Thanks for the clarification though.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net> writes:
> I thought Karl was urging us to wait until Friday before voting. FWIW, I +1
> r8009 as well.
Yes, in general. The current time is a bit slippery because it's
about both the 0.35.0 release and the 1.0 release. Even if 1.0 were
not coming soon, though, these changes would have been appropriate for
any interim release that was still in its "soak" period, that's why I
+1'd them. And, after all, they are crash fixes :-).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net>.
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 03:29, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When looking at the posts on this threads, I see that this is the status
> so far about commiting the changes:
>
> r8009 +1 kfogel
> 0
> -1
> r8010 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> 0
> -1
> r8011 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> 0
> -1
>
> About r8009:
> I'm +1 on it (but that don't count as my commit access are partial). So
> If we applies the 1.0 release rules on 0.35.0 (which posting on this
> thread suggests) then r8009 will not be merged.
> One thing to notice is that all of you are talking about r8009 issues,
> but only Karl votes. May I have your votes for r8009 please? :-)
>
> I will hold the merge for r8010 and r8011 until my evening (CET) and see
> if r8009 get some more votes or not (I have a feeling that r8009 just
> slipped away) :-)
I thought Karl was urging us to wait until Friday before voting. FWIW, I +1
r8009 as well.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by Erik Huelsmann <e....@gmx.net>.
> Hi Jostein,
> Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >When looking at the posts on this threads, I see that this is the status
> >so far about commiting the changes:
> >
> >r8009 +1 kfogel
> > 0
> > -1
> >r8010 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> > 0
> > -1
> >r8011 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> > 0
> > -1
> >
> >About r8009:
> >I'm +1 on it (but that don't count as my commit access are partial). So
> >If we applies the 1.0 release rules on 0.35.0 (which posting on this
> >thread suggests) then r8009 will not be merged.
> >One thing to notice is that all of you are talking about r8009 issues,
> >but only Karl votes. May I have your votes for r8009 please? :-)
> >
> >
> Without 8009, you can forget about javahl, because it will not compile.
Yeah, sorry for the confusion, I'm +1 on on too, but I meant to raise the
question whether it was a solution to something already in the 0.35.0 branch.
It has been confirmed to be.
r8009 +1 kfogel dionisos
0
-1
r8010 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
0
-1
r8011 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
0
-1
bye,
Erik.
--
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net>.
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 09.40, Patrick Mayweg wrote:
> Without 8009, you can forget about javahl, because it will not
> compile.
hrmf.. Then I can assume that I have 3 x +1s on all of them, right?
A commit to the release branch is on the way soon..
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by Patrick Mayweg <ma...@qint.de>.
Hi Jostein,
Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When looking at the posts on this threads, I see that this is the status
>so far about commiting the changes:
>
>r8009 +1 kfogel
> 0
> -1
>r8010 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> 0
> -1
>r8011 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> 0
> -1
>
>About r8009:
>I'm +1 on it (but that don't count as my commit access are partial). So
>If we applies the 1.0 release rules on 0.35.0 (which posting on this
>thread suggests) then r8009 will not be merged.
>One thing to notice is that all of you are talking about r8009 issues,
>but only Karl votes. May I have your votes for r8009 please? :-)
>
>
Without 8009, you can forget about javahl, because it will not compile.
>I will hold the merge for r8010 and r8011 until my evening (CET) and see
>if r8009 get some more votes or not (I have a feeling that r8009 just
>slipped away) :-)
>
>Jostein
>
>
>
Patrick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by Patrick Mayweg <ma...@qint.de>.
Hi Jostein,
Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
>On Wednesday 17 December 2003 09.29, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
>
>Thanks for the votes guys!
>
>The r8009, r8010 and r8011 are merged to branch 0.35.0 as r8025.
>
>Note that this will go into 1.0 as well.
>
>Jostein
>
>
>
Thanks. I did know that it will go into 1.0 also.
Patrick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)
Posted by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net>.
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 09.29, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
Thanks for the votes guys!
The r8009, r8010 and r8011 are merged to branch 0.35.0 as r8025.
Note that this will go into 1.0 as well.
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org