Thinking about attempting another RC

[Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>]

Any further comment or concerns on HBASE-13303 beforehand? It is an ugly
hack I hope to revert after we have a better fix, see tail of HBASE-11544,
but it or something like it is needed to prevent issues with scanning under
certain configuration settings should cells carry tags.

-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: Thinking about attempting another RC

[lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>]

I'd say let's give HBASE-13262 one more day. We do a have a lurking issue in 0.98 before 13303, so we shouldn't wait too long.Not the end of the world if HBASE-13262 goes in the next month - that's why we have monthly releases :)
-- Lars
      From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
 To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org> 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 2:53 PM
 Subject: Re: Thinking about attempting another RC
   
We already have HBASE-13303 as a stop gap for this release. I think it's ok
if
​
HBASE-13262 isn't ready right now, we will have another release in a month.
On the other hand, if it's ready before the RC is cut by all means let's
get it in. Right now I'm waiting for HBASE-13326 because the issue
indicates it affects 0.98 too.


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Lawlor <
jonathan.lawlor@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Should we wait for
> ​​
> HBASE-13262 to be in before this RC? Seems as though the
> change that is currently in the works would not require backporting
> HBASE-11544 and thus could be backported into 0.98 and branch-1.0 as well.
> If waiting for it to be in is not appropriate due to the need to get on top
> of the issue right away, I understand, just a thought.
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Coming tonight, then
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Anoop John <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for making new RC
> > >
> > > -Anoop-
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Any further comment or concerns on HBASE-13303 beforehand? It is an
> > ugly
> > > > hack I hope to revert after we have a better fix, see tail of
> > > HBASE-11544,
> > > > but it or something like it is needed to prevent issues with scanning
> > > under
> > > > certain configuration settings should cells carry tags.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)


> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

  - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

  

Re: Thinking about attempting another RC

[Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>]

We already have HBASE-13303 as a stop gap for this release. I think it's ok
if
​
HBASE-13262 isn't ready right now, we will have another release in a month.
On the other hand, if it's ready before the RC is cut by all means let's
get it in. Right now I'm waiting for HBASE-13326 because the issue
indicates it affects 0.98 too.


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Lawlor <
jonathan.lawlor@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Should we wait for
> ​​
> HBASE-13262 to be in before this RC? Seems as though the
> change that is currently in the works would not require backporting
> HBASE-11544 and thus could be backported into 0.98 and branch-1.0 as well.
> If waiting for it to be in is not appropriate due to the need to get on top
> of the issue right away, I understand, just a thought.
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Coming tonight, then
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Anoop John <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for making new RC
> > >
> > > -Anoop-
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Any further comment or concerns on HBASE-13303 beforehand? It is an
> > ugly
> > > > hack I hope to revert after we have a better fix, see tail of
> > > HBASE-11544,
> > > > but it or something like it is needed to prevent issues with scanning
> > > under
> > > > certain configuration settings should cells carry tags.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: Thinking about attempting another RC

[Jonathan Lawlor <jo...@cloudera.com>]

Should we wait for HBASE-13262 to be in before this RC? Seems as though the
change that is currently in the works would not require backporting
HBASE-11544 and thus could be backported into 0.98 and branch-1.0 as well.
If waiting for it to be in is not appropriate due to the need to get on top
of the issue right away, I understand, just a thought.

Jonathan

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks. Coming tonight, then
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Anoop John <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for making new RC
> >
> > -Anoop-
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Any further comment or concerns on HBASE-13303 beforehand? It is an
> ugly
> > > hack I hope to revert after we have a better fix, see tail of
> > HBASE-11544,
> > > but it or something like it is needed to prevent issues with scanning
> > under
> > > certain configuration settings should cells carry tags.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Re: Thinking about attempting another RC

[Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>]

Thanks. Coming tonight, then

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Anoop John <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for making new RC
>
> -Anoop-
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Any further comment or concerns on HBASE-13303 beforehand? It is an ugly
> > hack I hope to revert after we have a better fix, see tail of
> HBASE-11544,
> > but it or something like it is needed to prevent issues with scanning
> under
> > certain configuration settings should cells carry tags.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: Thinking about attempting another RC

[Anoop John <an...@gmail.com>]

+1 for making new RC

-Anoop-

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:

> Any further comment or concerns on HBASE-13303 beforehand? It is an ugly
> hack I hope to revert after we have a better fix, see tail of HBASE-11544,
> but it or something like it is needed to prevent issues with scanning under
> certain configuration settings should cells carry tags.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>