You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by 魏烽 <we...@nequal.com> on 2020/05/18 04:51:02 UTC

Ask questions

Hello:

I have a question and I really want to ask everyone。
I submitted a flink batch processing task in DolphinShceduler. After the flink task, the sql operation was performed. The sql operation failed, but the flink task was successful. How can I solve this problem?
The code is roughly as follows:
sincere gratitude!
[cid:D0196D76534369B158CF9F09E57F026B]
 原始邮件
发件人: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai<tz...@apache.org>
收件人: dev<de...@flink.apache.org>
发送时间: 2020年5月18日(周一) 12:02
主题: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and binarycompatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v)


+1

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:47 AM Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Leonard Xu <xb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Leonard Xu
> > > 在 2020年5月17日,00:30,Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com>> 写道:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Zhu Zhu
> > >
> > > Yun Tang <my...@live.com>> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> Yun Tang
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> From: Benchao Li <li...@gmail.com>>
> > >> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00
> > >> To: dev <de...@flink.apache.org>>
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and
> > >> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v)
> > >>
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道:
> > >>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> Piotrek
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a
> > >>>> development-oriented vote?)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Minor:
> > >>>> bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to
> > >> x.y.v
> > >>>> with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes.
> > >>>> I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility
> instead
> > >> of
> > >>>> forward?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>> Yu
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <zj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Definitely +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Dian Fu <di...@gmail.com>> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>> Dian
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <qc...@gmail.com>> 写道:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>> Congxian
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>> Yangze Guo
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <
> yuanmei.work@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang <
> > >>>>> wangzhijiang999@aliyun.com<ma...@aliyun.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>> .invalid>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33
> > >>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <de...@flink.apache.org>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are
> > >> API
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <
> > >>>>> trohrmann@apache.org<ma...@apache.org>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API
> and
> > >>>>>>>> binary
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix
> > >> releases
> > >>>>>>>> [1] I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary
> compatible
> > >>>>>>>> across
> > >>>>>>>>>> bug
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a
> > >> version
> > >>>>>>>> x.y.u
> > >>>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all
> > >>>>>>>> @PublicEvolving
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> classes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please
> > >>>>> provide
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
> by
> > >>>>>>>> majority
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Best Regards
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jeff Zhang
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Benchao Li
> > >> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking
> > University
> > >> Tel:+86-15650713730
> > >> Email: libenchao@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>; libenchao@pku.edu.cn<ma...@pku.edu.cn>
> > >>
> >
> >
>



Re: Ask questions

Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
Image attachments do not work on this mailing list; please re-send the 
question with the code as text.

On 18/05/2020 06:51, 魏烽 wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> I have a question and I really want to ask everyone。
> I submitted a flink batch processing task in DolphinShceduler. After 
> the flink task, the sql operation was performed. The sql operation 
> failed, but the flink task was successful. How can I solve this problem?
> The code is roughly as follows:
> sincere gratitude!
>  原始邮件
> *发件人:* Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai<tz...@apache.org>
> *收件人:* dev<de...@flink.apache.org>
> *发送时间:* 2020年5月18日(周一) 12:02
> *主题:* Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and 
> binarycompatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v)
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:47 AM Xintong Song <tonysong820@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Leonard Xu <xbjtdcq@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Leonard Xu
> > > > 在 2020年5月17日,00:30,Zhu Zhu <reedpor@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>> 写道:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Zhu Zhu
> > > >
> > > > Yun Tang <myasuka@live.com  <ma...@live.com>> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Yun Tang
> > > >> ________________________________
> > > >> From: Benchao Li <libenchao@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > >> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00
> > > >> To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org  <ma...@flink.apache.org>>
> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and
> > > >> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v)
> > > >>
> > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Piotr Nowojski <piotr@ververica.com  <ma...@ververica.com>> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Piotrek
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <carp84@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a
> > > >>>> development-oriented vote?)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Minor:
> > > >>>> bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to
> > > >> x.y.v
> > > >>>> with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes.
> > > >>>> I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility
> > instead
> > > >> of
> > > >>>> forward?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best Regards,
> > > >>>> Yu
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Definitely +1
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Dian Fu <dian0511.fu@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Regards,
> > > >>>>>> Dian
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <qcx978132955@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>> 写道:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>> Congxian
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Yangze Guo <karmagyz@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>> Yangze Guo
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <
> > yuanmei.work@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org  <ma...@apache.org>>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang <
> > > >>>>> wangzhijiang999@aliyun.com  <ma...@aliyun.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> .invalid>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <thw@apache.org  <ma...@apache.org>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org  <ma...@flink.apache.org>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are
> > > >> API
> > > >>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <
> > > >>>>> trohrmann@apache.org  <ma...@apache.org>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API
> > and
> > > >>>>>>>> binary
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix
> > > >> releases
> > > >>>>>>>> [1] I
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary
> > compatible
> > > >>>>>>>> across
> > > >>>>>>>>>> bug
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a
> > > >> version
> > > >>>>>>>> x.y.u
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> is
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all
> > > >>>>>>>> @PublicEvolving
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> classes.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please
> > > >>>>> provide
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
> > by
> > > >>>>>>>> majority
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>> Best Regards
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Jeff Zhang
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Benchao Li
> > > >> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking
> > > University
> > > >> Tel:+86-15650713730
> > > >> Email: libenchao@gmail.com  <ma...@gmail.com>;libenchao@pku.edu.cn  <ma...@pku.edu.cn>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>