You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> on 2009/03/29 15:45:36 UTC
Re: svn commit: r36838 - branches/ra_serf-kerb
Why start a separate branch? Why not just do this on trunk? It gets
more exposure/review that way.
It isn't like this code is going to destabilize trunk.
Cheers,
-g
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 13:35, Lieven Govaerts <lg...@mobsol.be> wrote:
> Author: lgo
> Date: Sun Mar 29 05:35:47 2009
> New Revision: 36838
>
> Log:
> * branches/ra_serf-kerb: created from trunk@36837.
>
> Added:
> branches/ra_serf-kerb/ (props changed)
> - copied from r36837, trunk/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=1470280
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1471697
Re: svn commit: r36838 - branches/ra_serf-kerb
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
Ah. Yeah, then it would be understandable. But I'm guessing the
framework is a little more solid, and this is "just another option",
and that the devs wouldn't be running/affected by that option.
I just have a fear of branch development :-)
Cheers,
-g
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 17:24, Lieven Govaerts <sv...@mobsol.be> wrote:
> With digest, ra_serf authn was broken for almost the whole duration of
> the branch. But, ok, if Kerberos doesn't require changes to the authn
> framework I'll do it on trunk.
>
> Lieven
>
> Greg Stein wrote:
>> Why start a separate branch? Why not just do this on trunk? It gets
>> more exposure/review that way.
>>
>> It isn't like this code is going to destabilize trunk.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 13:35, Lieven Govaerts <lg...@mobsol.be> wrote:
>>> Author: lgo
>>> Date: Sun Mar 29 05:35:47 2009
>>> New Revision: 36838
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> * branches/ra_serf-kerb: created from trunk@36837.
>>>
>>> Added:
>>> branches/ra_serf-kerb/ (props changed)
>>> - copied from r36837, trunk/
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=1470280
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1471697
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1472029
Re: svn commit: r36838 - branches/ra_serf-kerb
Posted by Lieven Govaerts <sv...@mobsol.be>.
With digest, ra_serf authn was broken for almost the whole duration of
the branch. But, ok, if Kerberos doesn't require changes to the authn
framework I'll do it on trunk.
Lieven
Greg Stein wrote:
> Why start a separate branch? Why not just do this on trunk? It gets
> more exposure/review that way.
>
> It isn't like this code is going to destabilize trunk.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 13:35, Lieven Govaerts <lg...@mobsol.be> wrote:
>> Author: lgo
>> Date: Sun Mar 29 05:35:47 2009
>> New Revision: 36838
>>
>> Log:
>> * branches/ra_serf-kerb: created from trunk@36837.
>>
>> Added:
>> branches/ra_serf-kerb/ (props changed)
>> - copied from r36837, trunk/
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=1470280
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1471697
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1472000