You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by "Abraham Elmahrek (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/02 18:53:34 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-1651) Sqoop2: Cleanup: Naming and ordering of methods in Repo relates classes

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14193936#comment-14193936 ] 

Abraham Elmahrek commented on SQOOP-1651:
-----------------------------------------

+1 committed. Thanks [~vybs]!

> Sqoop2: Cleanup: Naming and ordering of methods in Repo relates classes
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-1651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1651
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
>            Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: SQOOP-1651.patch
>
>
> this RB has 2 changes.
> for clarity in reading ( and forward thinking to separate the repo apis per entity so multiple repo support becomes easier) I group the link related and job related methods together
> Second, all the methods have the verb and then the noun convention.
> Except the 2 methods I have renamed them to be consistent, so it is clear than when a new methods is added we do not fight over naming conventions. Going forward we will document the coding guidelines for the sqoop code



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)