You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com> on 2017/02/06 12:57:35 UTC
[DISCUSS] JanusGraph in Provider Index
There was recently a request from Alexander Patrikalakis in JIRA (that
issues is now closed in favor of this thread) to add JanusGraph to the
provider index of the TinkerPop home page. I think that makes sense, though
at this time JanusGraph hasn't made a release yet that I'm aware of which
basically means that it's not quite yet in compliance with our listing
policies.
http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html
We don't always enforce those policies to the letter of their wording (thus
far they have been more like general guidelines) and I assume that a
JanusGraph release is likely a reasonably high priority right now for that
project.
Anyone have any strong feelings one way or another on adding JanusGraph
given our policies?
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph in Provider Index
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
JanusGraph was added a while ago - I believe as soon as the first release
dropped.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Jing Chen (Jerry) He <je...@apache.org>
wrote:
> FYI
>
> JanusGraph has had two official releases now:
>
> https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jerry
>
> On 2017-02-06 06:53 (-0700), Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think they should have one official release first. Right now its just
> source code and we shouldn’t set a precedence that deviates from our policy.
> >
> > Marko.
> >
> > http://markorodriguez.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 6, 2017, at 6:59 AM, Daniel Kuppitz <me...@gremlin.guru> wrote:
> > >
> > > Knowing where JanusGraph is coming from, I don't think we need an
> official
> > > release to get it listed.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmallette@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> There was recently a request from Alexander Patrikalakis in JIRA (that
> > >> issues is now closed in favor of this thread) to add JanusGraph to the
> > >> provider index of the TinkerPop home page. I think that makes sense,
> though
> > >> at this time JanusGraph hasn't made a release yet that I'm aware of
> which
> > >> basically means that it's not quite yet in compliance with our listing
> > >> policies.
> > >>
> > >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html
> > >>
> > >> We don't always enforce those policies to the letter of their wording
> (thus
> > >> far they have been more like general guidelines) and I assume that a
> > >> JanusGraph release is likely a reasonably high priority right now for
> that
> > >> project.
> > >>
> > >> Anyone have any strong feelings one way or another on adding
> JanusGraph
> > >> given our policies?
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph in Provider Index
Posted by "Jing Chen (Jerry) He" <je...@apache.org>.
FYI
JanusGraph has had two official releases now:
https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/
Thanks,
Jerry
On 2017-02-06 06:53 (-0700), Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think they should have one official release first. Right now its just source code and we shouldnât set a precedence that deviates from our policy.
>
> Marko.
>
> http://markorodriguez.com
>
>
>
> > On Feb 6, 2017, at 6:59 AM, Daniel Kuppitz <me...@gremlin.guru> wrote:
> >
> > Knowing where JanusGraph is coming from, I don't think we need an official
> > release to get it listed.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> There was recently a request from Alexander Patrikalakis in JIRA (that
> >> issues is now closed in favor of this thread) to add JanusGraph to the
> >> provider index of the TinkerPop home page. I think that makes sense, though
> >> at this time JanusGraph hasn't made a release yet that I'm aware of which
> >> basically means that it's not quite yet in compliance with our listing
> >> policies.
> >>
> >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html
> >>
> >> We don't always enforce those policies to the letter of their wording (thus
> >> far they have been more like general guidelines) and I assume that a
> >> JanusGraph release is likely a reasonably high priority right now for that
> >> project.
> >>
> >> Anyone have any strong feelings one way or another on adding JanusGraph
> >> given our policies?
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph in Provider Index
Posted by Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I think they should have one official release first. Right now its just source code and we shouldn’t set a precedence that deviates from our policy.
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 6:59 AM, Daniel Kuppitz <me...@gremlin.guru> wrote:
>
> Knowing where JanusGraph is coming from, I don't think we need an official
> release to get it listed.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There was recently a request from Alexander Patrikalakis in JIRA (that
>> issues is now closed in favor of this thread) to add JanusGraph to the
>> provider index of the TinkerPop home page. I think that makes sense, though
>> at this time JanusGraph hasn't made a release yet that I'm aware of which
>> basically means that it's not quite yet in compliance with our listing
>> policies.
>>
>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html
>>
>> We don't always enforce those policies to the letter of their wording (thus
>> far they have been more like general guidelines) and I assume that a
>> JanusGraph release is likely a reasonably high priority right now for that
>> project.
>>
>> Anyone have any strong feelings one way or another on adding JanusGraph
>> given our policies?
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph in Provider Index
Posted by Daniel Kuppitz <me...@gremlin.guru>.
Knowing where JanusGraph is coming from, I don't think we need an official
release to get it listed.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> There was recently a request from Alexander Patrikalakis in JIRA (that
> issues is now closed in favor of this thread) to add JanusGraph to the
> provider index of the TinkerPop home page. I think that makes sense, though
> at this time JanusGraph hasn't made a release yet that I'm aware of which
> basically means that it's not quite yet in compliance with our listing
> policies.
>
> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html
>
> We don't always enforce those policies to the letter of their wording (thus
> far they have been more like general guidelines) and I assume that a
> JanusGraph release is likely a reasonably high priority right now for that
> project.
>
> Anyone have any strong feelings one way or another on adding JanusGraph
> given our policies?
>