You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/11/14 22:45:13 UTC

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2760) optimize spanfirstquery, spanpositionrangequery

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12931896#action_12931896 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2760:
-------------------------------------

Admittedly, I don't yet have a good benchmarking setup for these spanqueries yet.

But from doing a quick test on a 125k doc corpus, the SpanFirstQuery on a common term like "the" took
about half the time.. this is because it read/evaluated 117,556 positions instead of 1,029,622 positions.


> optimize spanfirstquery, spanpositionrangequery
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2760
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2760
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2760.patch
>
>
> SpanFirstQuery and SpanPositionRangeQuery (SpanFirst is just a special case of this), are currently inefficient.
> Take this worst case example: SpanFirstQuery("the").
> Currently the code reads all the positions for the term "the".
> But when enumerating spans, once we have passed the allowable range we should move on to the next document (skipTo)
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org