You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2018/02/08 05:37:51 UTC
[VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 2.3.0, as
follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2],
which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
* website pull request listing the release and publishing the API reference
manual [6].
* Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
* Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
dist.apache.org [2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval,
with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
Thanks,
JB
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
[4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
[5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
[6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Reuven Lax <re...@google.com>.
Wont' 4645 still require an RC3?
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
wrote:
> +1 for continuing the release after the immediate fix (
> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4645). I don't think
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 is due to a recent update
> to google-cloud-platform module so the issue likely existed in some form in
> previous releases as well.
>
> - Cham
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:47 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> IMHO it is not a blocker but an incompatibility between spark and some IO
>> stack. Trivial workaround is to shade the io before importing it in its
>> project. Amternative is to wrap IO in custom classloaders.
>>
>> Didnt check for this one but it is a common beam issue to have conflicts
>> between runners/io or even 2 ios so it shouldnt block a release by itself
>> until beam aims to solve properly conflicts - which means without shading
>> which breaks the io ecosystem on the user side.
>>
>> Just my 2cts
>>
>> Le 9 févr. 2018 06:07, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <jb...@nanthrax.net> a écrit :
>>
>>> Is it specific to this release ? I think it was like this before no ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2018 12:48 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>>> > Since root cause is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 I
>>> marked it
>>> > a blocker so we can discuss fixes or workarounds there.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
>>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the spreadsheet
>>> and
>>> > currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark runner
>>> failing. Filed
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668
>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668> with the full
>>> details.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev <
>>> valentyn@google.com
>>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Yes (thanks Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/
>>> beam-2.3.0-release-validation
>>> > <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov <
>>> kirpichov@google.com
>>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for this one?
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay <
>>> altay@google.com
>>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples,
>>> streaming
>>> > on Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> Blog
>>> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>> > <https://www.packtpub.com/
>>> application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>> >
>>> > 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <
>>> iemejia@gmail.com
>>> > <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>>> >
>>> > +1 (binding)
>>> >
>>> > Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
>>> > Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>>> > Validated that the 3 regressions reported for
>>> RC1 were
>>> > fixed.
>>> > Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local
>>> mode, no
>>> > regressions now.
>>> > Installed python version on virtualenv and run
>>> wordcount
>>> > with success.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste
>>> Onofré
>>> > <jb@nanthrax.net <ma...@nanthrax.net>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Hi everyone,
>>> > >
>>> > > Please review and vote on the release
>>> candidate #2 for
>>> > the version 2.3.0, as
>>> > > follows:
>>> > >
>>> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
>>> provide
>>> > specific comments)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > The complete staging area is available for
>>> your
>>> > review, which includes:
>>> > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> > > * the official Apache source release to be
>>> deployed to
>>> > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
>>> > > which is signed with the key with
>>> fingerprint C8282E76
>>> > [3],
>>> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
>>> Central
>>> > Repository [4],
>>> > > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>>> > > * website pull request listing the release
>>> and
>>> > publishing the API reference
>>> > > manual [6].
>>> > > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9
>>> and
>>> > Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
>>> > > * Python artifacts are deployed along with
>>> the source
>>> > release to the
>>> > > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>>> [2].
>>> > >
>>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> It is
>>> > adopted by majority approval,
>>> > > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > JB
>>> > >
>>> > > [1]
>>> > >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/
>>> jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/
>>> jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
>>> > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>> dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>> > <https://dist.apache.org/
>>> repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>>> > > [3]
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/
>>> repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>> > <https://dist.apache.org/
>>> repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>>> > > [4]
>>> > https://repository.apache.
>>> org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
>>> > <https://repository.apache.
>>> org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/>
>>> > > [5] https://github.com/apache/
>>> beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>>> > <https://github.com/apache/
>>> beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2>
>>> > > [6] https://github.com/apache/
>>> beam-site/pull/381
>>> > <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
>>> > > --
>>> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> > > jbonofre@apache.org <mailto:
>>> jbonofre@apache.org>
>>> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>.
+1 for option 1 (fix and create a new +RC3). This not only breaks
examples, this means that users of the spark runner won't have any
guarantee about the fact that the Google IOs work or not because of
possible missing methods or conflicts between netty versions.
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 7:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> since it breaks only examples not sure it does worth yet another reroll
> (which means already a 2 weeks delay on the plan). Users will be affected
> the same anyway - and in an expected way until beam handles classloaders per
> transform. A note in the side is fine probably.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>
> 2018-02-09 7:23 GMT+01:00 Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It means a RC3 then.
>>>
>>> Basically, we have two options:
>>>
>>> 1. I cancel RC2, to include PR 4645 and cut a RC3. It can be done super
>>> fast
>>> (today).
>>
>>
>> +1 for option 1 since IMO we should not release with quickstart broken for
>> Spark.
>>
>>>
>>> 2. We continue RC2 vote and we add a note about shading (as I did for the
>>> TextIO
>>> issue with Flink runner).
>>>
>>> I'm more in favor of 1 as the fix is already there and cutting a release
>>> is
>>> super fast for me.
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2018 07:06 AM, Chamikara Jayalath wrote:
>>> > +1 for continuing the release after the immediate fix
>>> > (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4645). I don't
>>> > think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 is due to a
>>> > recent update
>>> > to google-cloud-platform module so the issue likely existed in some
>>> > form in
>>> > previous releases as well.
>>> >
>>> > - Cham
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:47 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>> > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > IMHO it is not a blocker but an incompatibility between spark and
>>> > some IO
>>> > stack. Trivial workaround is to shade the io before importing it in
>>> > its
>>> > project. Amternative is to wrap IO in custom classloaders.
>>> >
>>> > Didnt check for this one but it is a common beam issue to have
>>> > conflicts
>>> > between runners/io or even 2 ios so it shouldnt block a release by
>>> > itself
>>> > until beam aims to solve properly conflicts - which means without
>>> > shading
>>> > which breaks the io ecosystem on the user side.
>>> >
>>> > Just my 2cts
>>> >
>>> > Le 9 févr. 2018 06:07, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <jb@nanthrax.net
>>> > <ma...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
>>> >
>>> > Is it specific to this release ? I think it was like this
>>> > before no ?
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > JB
>>> >
>>> > On 02/09/2018 12:48 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>>> > > Since root cause is
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 I
>>> > marked it
>>> > > a blocker so we can discuss fixes or workarounds there.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
>>> > <ma...@google.com>
>>> > > <mailto:lcwik@google.com <ma...@google.com>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the
>>> > spreadsheet and
>>> > > currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark
>>> > runner
>>> > failing. Filed
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668
>>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668> with
>>> > the full
>>> > details.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev
>>> > <valentyn@google.com <ma...@google.com>
>>> > > <mailto:valentyn@google.com
>>> > <ma...@google.com>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Yes (thanks
>>> > Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
>>> > > <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov
>>> > <kirpichov@google.com <ma...@google.com>
>>> > > <mailto:kirpichov@google.com
>>> > <ma...@google.com>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for
>>> > this one?
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay
>>> > <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>
>>> > > <mailto:altay@google.com
>>> > <ma...@google.com>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > +1
>>> > >
>>> > > I verified python quick start, mobile gaming
>>> > examples,
>>> > streaming
>>> > > on Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain
>>> > Manni-Bucau
>>> > > <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>> > <ma...@gmail.com>
>>> > <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the
>>> > effort!
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > > @rmannibucau
>>> > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>> > Blog
>>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> |
>>> > Github
>>> > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> > LinkedIn
>>> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>> > | Book
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>> > >
>>> > > 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía
>>> > <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>>> > > <mailto:iemejia@gmail.com
>>> > <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
>>> > >
>>> > > +1 (binding)
>>> > >
>>> > > Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip
>>> > file.
>>> > > Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>>> > > Validated that the 3 regressions
>>> > reported for
>>> > RC1 were
>>> > > fixed.
>>> > > Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on
>>> > local
>>> > mode, no
>>> > > regressions now.
>>> > > Installed python version on
>>> > virtualenv and run
>>> > wordcount
>>> > > with success.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM,
>>> > Jean-Baptiste
>>> > Onofré
>>> > > <jb@nanthrax.net
>>> > <ma...@nanthrax.net>
>>> > <mailto:jb@nanthrax.net <ma...@nanthrax.net>>> wrote:
>>> > > > Hi everyone,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Please review and vote on the
>>> > release
>>> > candidate #2 for
>>> > > the version 2.3.0, as
>>> > > > follows:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release
>>> > (please
>>> > provide
>>> > > specific comments)
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The complete staging area is
>>> > available for your
>>> > > review, which includes:
>>> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> > > > * the official Apache source
>>> > release to be
>>> > deployed to
>>> > > dist.apache.org
>>> > <http://dist.apache.org>
>>> > <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
>>> > > > which is signed with the key with
>>> > fingerprint C8282E76
>>> > > [3],
>>> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to
>>> > the Maven
>>> > Central
>>> > > Repository [4],
>>> > > > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>>> > > > * website pull request listing the
>>> > release and
>>> > > publishing the API reference
>>> > > > manual [6].
>>> > > > * Java artifacts were built with
>>> > Maven 3.3.9 and
>>> > > Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
>>> > > > * Python artifacts are deployed
>>> > along with
>>> > the source
>>> > > release to the
>>> > > > dist.apache.org
>>> > <http://dist.apache.org>
>>> > <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The vote will be open for at least
>>> > 72 hours.
>>> > It is
>>> > > adopted by majority approval,
>>> > > > with at least 3 PMC affirmative
>>> > votes.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > JB
>>> > > >
>>> > > > [1]
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
>>> > > > [2]
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>> > >
>>> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>>> > > > [3]
>>> > >
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>> > >
>>> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>>> > > > [4]
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/>
>>> > > > [5]
>>> > https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>>> > >
>>> > <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2>
>>> > > > [6]
>>> > https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>> > >
>>> > <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> > > > jbonofre@apache.org
>>> > <ma...@apache.org> <mailto:jbonofre@apache.org
>>> > <ma...@apache.org>>
>>> > > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> > > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> > jbonofre@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
since it breaks only examples not sure it does worth yet another reroll
(which means already a 2 weeks delay on the plan). Users will be affected
the same anyway - and in an expected way until beam handles classloaders
per transform. A note in the side is fine probably.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
2018-02-09 7:23 GMT+01:00 Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> It means a RC3 then.
>>
>> Basically, we have two options:
>>
>> 1. I cancel RC2, to include PR 4645 and cut a RC3. It can be done super
>> fast
>> (today).
>>
>
> +1 for option 1 since IMO we should not release with quickstart broken for
> Spark.
>
>
>> 2. We continue RC2 vote and we add a note about shading (as I did for the
>> TextIO
>> issue with Flink runner).
>>
>> I'm more in favor of 1 as the fix is already there and cutting a release
>> is
>> super fast for me.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 02/09/2018 07:06 AM, Chamikara Jayalath wrote:
>> > +1 for continuing the release after the immediate fix
>> > (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4645). I don't
>> > think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 is due to a
>> recent update
>> > to google-cloud-platform module so the issue likely existed in some
>> form in
>> > previous releases as well.
>> >
>> > - Cham
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:47 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > IMHO it is not a blocker but an incompatibility between spark and
>> some IO
>> > stack. Trivial workaround is to shade the io before importing it in
>> its
>> > project. Amternative is to wrap IO in custom classloaders.
>> >
>> > Didnt check for this one but it is a common beam issue to have
>> conflicts
>> > between runners/io or even 2 ios so it shouldnt block a release by
>> itself
>> > until beam aims to solve properly conflicts - which means without
>> shading
>> > which breaks the io ecosystem on the user side.
>> >
>> > Just my 2cts
>> >
>> > Le 9 févr. 2018 06:07, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <jb@nanthrax.net
>> > <ma...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
>> >
>> > Is it specific to this release ? I think it was like this
>> before no ?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>> >
>> > On 02/09/2018 12:48 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>> > > Since root cause is https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/BEAM-3519 I
>> > marked it
>> > > a blocker so we can discuss fixes or workarounds there.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
>> > <ma...@google.com>
>> > > <mailto:lcwik@google.com <ma...@google.com>>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the
>> spreadsheet and
>> > > currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark
>> runner
>> > failing. Filed
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668
>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668> with
>> the full
>> > details.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev
>> > <valentyn@google.com <ma...@google.com>
>> > > <mailto:valentyn@google.com <ma...@google.com>>>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Yes (thanks
>> > Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
>> > > <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov
>> > <kirpichov@google.com <ma...@google.com>
>> > > <mailto:kirpichov@google.com <mailto:
>> kirpichov@google.com>>>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for
>> this one?
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay
>> > <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>
>> > > <mailto:altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>>>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > I verified python quick start, mobile gaming
>> examples,
>> > streaming
>> > > on Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain
>> Manni-Bucau
>> > > <rmannibucau@gmail.com <mailto:
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>> > <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the
>> effort!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/
>> rmannibucau> | Blog
>> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> |
>> Old Blog
>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>
>> | Github
>> > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn
>> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
>> Book
>> > >
>> > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-
>> ee-8-high-performance>
>> > >
>> > > 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía
>> > <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>> > > <mailto:iemejia@gmail.com
>> > <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
>> > >
>> > > +1 (binding)
>> > >
>> > > Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip
>> file.
>> > > Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>> > > Validated that the 3 regressions
>> reported for
>> > RC1 were
>> > > fixed.
>> > > Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on
>> local
>> > mode, no
>> > > regressions now.
>> > > Installed python version on
>> virtualenv and run
>> > wordcount
>> > > with success.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM,
>> Jean-Baptiste
>> > Onofré
>> > > <jb@nanthrax.net <mailto:
>> jb@nanthrax.net>
>> > <mailto:jb@nanthrax.net <ma...@nanthrax.net>>> wrote:
>> > > > Hi everyone,
>> > > >
>> > > > Please review and vote on the
>> release
>> > candidate #2 for
>> > > the version 2.3.0, as
>> > > > follows:
>> > > >
>> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release
>> (please
>> > provide
>> > > specific comments)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The complete staging area is
>> available for your
>> > > review, which includes:
>> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > > > * the official Apache source
>> release to be
>> > deployed to
>> > > dist.apache.org <
>> http://dist.apache.org>
>> > <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
>> > > > which is signed with the key with
>> > fingerprint C8282E76
>> > > [3],
>> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to
>> the Maven
>> > Central
>> > > Repository [4],
>> > > > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>> > > > * website pull request listing the
>> release and
>> > > publishing the API reference
>> > > > manual [6].
>> > > > * Java artifacts were built with
>> Maven 3.3.9 and
>> > > Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
>> > > > * Python artifacts are deployed
>> along with
>> > the source
>> > > release to the
>> > > > dist.apache.org <
>> http://dist.apache.org>
>> > <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>> > > >
>> > > > The vote will be open for at least
>> 72 hours.
>> > It is
>> > > adopted by majority approval,
>> > > > with at least 3 PMC affirmative
>> votes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > JB
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>> > >
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
>> > > > [2]
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>> > >
>> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>> > > > [3]
>> > >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> > >
>> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>> > > > [4]
>> > >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapachebeam-1027/
>> > >
>> > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapachebeam-1027/>
>> > > > [5]
>> > https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>> > > <https://github.com/apache/
>> beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2>
>> > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/
>> beam-site/pull/381
>> > > <https://github.com/apache/
>> beam-site/pull/381>
>> > > > --
>> > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> > > > jbonofre@apache.org
>> > <ma...@apache.org> <mailto:jbonofre@apache.org
>> > <ma...@apache.org>>
>> > > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> > > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> > jbonofre@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> It means a RC3 then.
>
> Basically, we have two options:
>
> 1. I cancel RC2, to include PR 4645 and cut a RC3. It can be done super
> fast
> (today).
>
+1 for option 1 since IMO we should not release with quickstart broken for
Spark.
> 2. We continue RC2 vote and we add a note about shading (as I did for the
> TextIO
> issue with Flink runner).
>
> I'm more in favor of 1 as the fix is already there and cutting a release is
> super fast for me.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/09/2018 07:06 AM, Chamikara Jayalath wrote:
> > +1 for continuing the release after the immediate fix
> > (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4645). I don't
> > think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 is due to a
> recent update
> > to google-cloud-platform module so the issue likely existed in some form
> in
> > previous releases as well.
> >
> > - Cham
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:47 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > IMHO it is not a blocker but an incompatibility between spark and
> some IO
> > stack. Trivial workaround is to shade the io before importing it in
> its
> > project. Amternative is to wrap IO in custom classloaders.
> >
> > Didnt check for this one but it is a common beam issue to have
> conflicts
> > between runners/io or even 2 ios so it shouldnt block a release by
> itself
> > until beam aims to solve properly conflicts - which means without
> shading
> > which breaks the io ecosystem on the user side.
> >
> > Just my 2cts
> >
> > Le 9 févr. 2018 06:07, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <jb@nanthrax.net
> > <ma...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
> >
> > Is it specific to this release ? I think it was like this before
> no ?
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 02/09/2018 12:48 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > > Since root cause is
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 I
> > marked it
> > > a blocker so we can discuss fixes or workarounds there.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> > <ma...@google.com>
> > > <mailto:lcwik@google.com <ma...@google.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the
> spreadsheet and
> > > currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark runner
> > failing. Filed
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668> with
> the full
> > details.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev
> > <valentyn@google.com <ma...@google.com>
> > > <mailto:valentyn@google.com <ma...@google.com>>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes (thanks
> > Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
> > > <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov
> > <kirpichov@google.com <ma...@google.com>
> > > <mailto:kirpichov@google.com <mailto:
> kirpichov@google.com>>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for
> this one?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay
> > <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>
> > > <mailto:altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I verified python quick start, mobile gaming
> examples,
> > streaming
> > > on Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain
> Manni-Bucau
> > > <rmannibucau@gmail.com <mailto:
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <
> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
> Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>
> | Github
> > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> Book
> > >
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> > >
> > > 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía
> > <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:iemejia@gmail.com
> > <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip
> file.
> > > Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
> > > Validated that the 3 regressions
> reported for
> > RC1 were
> > > fixed.
> > > Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on
> local
> > mode, no
> > > regressions now.
> > > Installed python version on virtualenv
> and run
> > wordcount
> > > with success.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM,
> Jean-Baptiste
> > Onofré
> > > <jb@nanthrax.net <mailto:
> jb@nanthrax.net>
> > <mailto:jb@nanthrax.net <ma...@nanthrax.net>>> wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Please review and vote on the release
> > candidate #2 for
> > > the version 2.3.0, as
> > > > follows:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release
> (please
> > provide
> > > specific comments)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The complete staging area is
> available for your
> > > review, which includes:
> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > * the official Apache source release
> to be
> > deployed to
> > > dist.apache.org <
> http://dist.apache.org>
> > <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
> > > > which is signed with the key with
> > fingerprint C8282E76
> > > [3],
> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to
> the Maven
> > Central
> > > Repository [4],
> > > > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
> > > > * website pull request listing the
> release and
> > > publishing the API reference
> > > > manual [6].
> > > > * Java artifacts were built with
> Maven 3.3.9 and
> > > Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
> > > > * Python artifacts are deployed
> along with
> > the source
> > > release to the
> > > > dist.apache.org <
> http://dist.apache.org>
> > <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least
> 72 hours.
> > It is
> > > adopted by majority approval,
> > > > with at least 3 PMC affirmative
> votes.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> > >
> > <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> >
> > > > [2]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
> > >
> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
> > > > [3]
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > >
> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
> > > > [4]
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
> > >
> > <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/>
> > > > [5]
> > https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
> > > <
> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2>
> > > > [6]
> https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
> > > <
> https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > > jbonofre@apache.org
> > <ma...@apache.org> <mailto:jbonofre@apache.org
> > <ma...@apache.org>>
> > > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbonofre@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
It means a RC3 then.
Basically, we have two options:
1. I cancel RC2, to include PR 4645 and cut a RC3. It can be done super fast
(today).
2. We continue RC2 vote and we add a note about shading (as I did for the TextIO
issue with Flink runner).
I'm more in favor of 1 as the fix is already there and cutting a release is
super fast for me.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
On 02/09/2018 07:06 AM, Chamikara Jayalath wrote:
> +1 for continuing the release after the immediate fix
> (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4645). I don't
> think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 is due to a recent update
> to google-cloud-platform module so the issue likely existed in some form in
> previous releases as well.
>
> - Cham
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:47 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> IMHO it is not a blocker but an incompatibility between spark and some IO
> stack. Trivial workaround is to shade the io before importing it in its
> project. Amternative is to wrap IO in custom classloaders.
>
> Didnt check for this one but it is a common beam issue to have conflicts
> between runners/io or even 2 ios so it shouldnt block a release by itself
> until beam aims to solve properly conflicts - which means without shading
> which breaks the io ecosystem on the user side.
>
> Just my 2cts
>
> Le 9 févr. 2018 06:07, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <jb@nanthrax.net
> <ma...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
>
> Is it specific to this release ? I think it was like this before no ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/09/2018 12:48 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > Since root cause is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 I
> marked it
> > a blocker so we can discuss fixes or workarounds there.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>
> > <mailto:lcwik@google.com <ma...@google.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the spreadsheet and
> > currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark runner
> failing. Filed
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668> with the full
> details.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev
> <valentyn@google.com <ma...@google.com>
> > <mailto:valentyn@google.com <ma...@google.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Yes (thanks
> Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
> > <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov
> <kirpichov@google.com <ma...@google.com>
> > <mailto:kirpichov@google.com <ma...@google.com>>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for this one?
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay
> <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>
> > <mailto:altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples,
> streaming
> > on Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
> <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> >
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> >
> > 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía
> <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:iemejia@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
> > Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
> > Validated that the 3 regressions reported for
> RC1 were
> > fixed.
> > Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local
> mode, no
> > regressions now.
> > Installed python version on virtualenv and run
> wordcount
> > with success.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste
> Onofré
> > <jb@nanthrax.net <ma...@nanthrax.net>
> <mailto:jb@nanthrax.net <ma...@nanthrax.net>>> wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Please review and vote on the release
> candidate #2 for
> > the version 2.3.0, as
> > > follows:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
> provide
> > specific comments)
> > >
> > >
> > > The complete staging area is available for your
> > review, which includes:
> > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > * the official Apache source release to be
> deployed to
> > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
> <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
> > > which is signed with the key with
> fingerprint C8282E76
> > [3],
> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
> Central
> > Repository [4],
> > > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
> > > * website pull request listing the release and
> > publishing the API reference
> > > manual [6].
> > > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and
> > Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
> > > * Python artifacts are deployed along with
> the source
> > release to the
> > > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
> <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> It is
> > adopted by majority approval,
> > > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > JB
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> >
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
> > > [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
> >
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
> > > [3]
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> >
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
> > > [4]
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
> >
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/>
> > > [5]
> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
> > <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2>
> > > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
> > <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > jbonofre@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org> <mailto:jbonofre@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>>
> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>.
+1 for continuing the release after the immediate fix (
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4645). I don't think
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 is due to a recent update
to google-cloud-platform module so the issue likely existed in some form in
previous releases as well.
- Cham
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:47 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> IMHO it is not a blocker but an incompatibility between spark and some IO
> stack. Trivial workaround is to shade the io before importing it in its
> project. Amternative is to wrap IO in custom classloaders.
>
> Didnt check for this one but it is a common beam issue to have conflicts
> between runners/io or even 2 ios so it shouldnt block a release by itself
> until beam aims to solve properly conflicts - which means without shading
> which breaks the io ecosystem on the user side.
>
> Just my 2cts
>
> Le 9 févr. 2018 06:07, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <jb...@nanthrax.net> a écrit :
>
>> Is it specific to this release ? I think it was like this before no ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 02/09/2018 12:48 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>> > Since root cause is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 I
>> marked it
>> > a blocker so we can discuss fixes or workarounds there.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the spreadsheet
>> and
>> > currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark runner
>> failing. Filed
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668> with the full
>> details.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev <
>> valentyn@google.com
>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes (thanks Kenn!):
>> https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
>> > <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov <
>> kirpichov@google.com
>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for this one?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay <
>> altay@google.com
>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples,
>> streaming
>> > on Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
>> >
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>> Blog
>> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> > <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> >
>> >
>> > 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <
>> iemejia@gmail.com
>> > <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
>> > Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>> > Validated that the 3 regressions reported for
>> RC1 were
>> > fixed.
>> > Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local
>> mode, no
>> > regressions now.
>> > Installed python version on virtualenv and run
>> wordcount
>> > with success.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste
>> Onofré
>> > <jb@nanthrax.net <ma...@nanthrax.net>>
>> wrote:
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > >
>> > > Please review and vote on the release
>> candidate #2 for
>> > the version 2.3.0, as
>> > > follows:
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
>> provide
>> > specific comments)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The complete staging area is available for
>> your
>> > review, which includes:
>> > > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > > * the official Apache source release to be
>> deployed to
>> > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
>> > > which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>> C8282E76
>> > [3],
>> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
>> Central
>> > Repository [4],
>> > > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>> > > * website pull request listing the release and
>> > publishing the API reference
>> > > manual [6].
>> > > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9
>> and
>> > Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
>> > > * Python artifacts are deployed along with
>> the source
>> > release to the
>> > > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>> > >
>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> It is
>> > adopted by majority approval,
>> > > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > JB
>> > >
>> > > [1]
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>> > <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>> >
>> > > [2]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>> > <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>> > > [3]
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> > <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>> > > [4]
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
>> > <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/>
>> > > [5]
>> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>> > <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>> >
>> > > [6]
>> https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>> > <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
>> > > --
>> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> > > jbonofre@apache.org <mailto:
>> jbonofre@apache.org>
>> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
IMHO it is not a blocker but an incompatibility between spark and some IO
stack. Trivial workaround is to shade the io before importing it in its
project. Amternative is to wrap IO in custom classloaders.
Didnt check for this one but it is a common beam issue to have conflicts
between runners/io or even 2 ios so it shouldnt block a release by itself
until beam aims to solve properly conflicts - which means without shading
which breaks the io ecosystem on the user side.
Just my 2cts
Le 9 févr. 2018 06:07, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <jb...@nanthrax.net> a écrit :
> Is it specific to this release ? I think it was like this before no ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/09/2018 12:48 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > Since root cause is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 I
> marked it
> > a blocker so we can discuss fixes or workarounds there.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the spreadsheet
> and
> > currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark runner failing.
> Filed
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668> with the full
> details.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev <
> valentyn@google.com
> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Yes (thanks Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/
> beam-2.3.0-release-validation
> > <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov <
> kirpichov@google.com
> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for this one?
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com
> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples,
> streaming
> > on Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
> Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <https://www.packtpub.com/
> application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> >
> > 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <
> iemejia@gmail.com
> > <ma...@gmail.com>>:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
> > Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
> > Validated that the 3 regressions reported for
> RC1 were
> > fixed.
> > Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local
> mode, no
> > regressions now.
> > Installed python version on virtualenv and run
> wordcount
> > with success.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste
> Onofré
> > <jb@nanthrax.net <ma...@nanthrax.net>>
> wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Please review and vote on the release
> candidate #2 for
> > the version 2.3.0, as
> > > follows:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
> provide
> > specific comments)
> > >
> > >
> > > The complete staging area is available for your
> > review, which includes:
> > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > * the official Apache source release to be
> deployed to
> > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
> > > which is signed with the key with fingerprint
> C8282E76
> > [3],
> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
> Central
> > Repository [4],
> > > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
> > > * website pull request listing the release and
> > publishing the API reference
> > > manual [6].
> > > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9
> and
> > Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
> > > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the
> source
> > release to the
> > > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> It is
> > adopted by majority approval,
> > > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > JB
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> > <https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
> > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
> > <https://dist.apache.org/
> repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
> > > [3]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > <https://dist.apache.org/
> repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
> > > [4]
> > https://repository.apache.org/
> content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
> > <https://repository.apache.
> org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/>
> > > [5] https://github.com/apache/
> beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
> > <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2>
> > > [6] https://github.com/apache/
> beam-site/pull/381
> > <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > jbonofre@apache.org <mailto:
> jbonofre@apache.org>
> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Is it specific to this release ? I think it was like this before no ?
Regards
JB
On 02/09/2018 12:48 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Since root cause is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 I marked it
> a blocker so we can discuss fixes or workarounds there.
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the spreadsheet and
> currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark runner failing. Filed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668> with the full details.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev <valentyn@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Yes (thanks Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
> <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov <kirpichov@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for this one?
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples, streaming
> on Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibucau@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
> 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <iemejia@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
> Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
> Validated that the 3 regressions reported for RC1 were
> fixed.
> Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local mode, no
> regressions now.
> Installed python version on virtualenv and run wordcount
> with success.
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> <jb@nanthrax.net <ma...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for
> the version 2.3.0, as
> > follows:
> >
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> specific comments)
> >
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your
> review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76
> [3],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> Repository [4],
> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
> > * website pull request listing the release and
> publishing the API reference
> > manual [6].
> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and
> Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
> release to the
> > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
> adopted by majority approval,
> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > JB
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
> > [3]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
> > [4]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/>
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2>
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbonofre@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>.
Since root cause is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519 I
marked it a blocker so we can discuss fixes or workarounds there.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
> I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the spreadsheet and
> currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark runner failing. Filed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668 with the full details.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev <va...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes (thanks Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov <ki...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for this one?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples, streaming on
>>>> Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
>>>>>> Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>>>>>> Validated that the 3 regressions reported for RC1 were fixed.
>>>>>> Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local mode, no regressions now.
>>>>>> Installed python version on virtualenv and run wordcount with success.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi everyone,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>>>>>> 2.3.0, as
>>>>>> > follows:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2],
>>>>>> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>>>>>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>>>>>> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>>>>>> reference
>>>>>> > manual [6].
>>>>>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK
>>>>>> 1.8.0_111.
>>>>>> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>>>>> > dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>> majority approval,
>>>>>> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> > JB
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [1]
>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>> ctId=12319527&version=12341608
>>>>>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>>>>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>> > [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>> beam-1027/
>>>>>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>>>>>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> > jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com>.
I validated several of the quickstarts and updated the spreadsheet and
currently am voting -1 for this release due to Spark runner failing. Filed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3668 with the full details.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev <va...@google.com>
wrote:
> Yes (thanks Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov <ki...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for this one?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples, streaming on
>>> Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>
>>>> 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
>>>>> Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>>>>> Validated that the 3 regressions reported for RC1 were fixed.
>>>>> Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local mode, no regressions now.
>>>>> Installed python version on virtualenv and run wordcount with success.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi everyone,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>>>>> 2.3.0, as
>>>>> > follows:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>> includes:
>>>>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>> dist.apache.org [2],
>>>>> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>>>>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>>>>> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>>>>> reference
>>>>> > manual [6].
>>>>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK
>>>>> 1.8.0_111.
>>>>> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>>>> > dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>> majority approval,
>>>>> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > JB
>>>>> >
>>>>> > [1]
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>> ctId=12319527&version=12341608
>>>>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>>>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>> > [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>> beam-1027/
>>>>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>>>>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> > jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Valentyn Tymofieiev <va...@google.com>.
Yes (thanks Kenn!): https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Eugene Kirpichov <ki...@google.com>
wrote:
> Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for this one?
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples, streaming on
>> Direct and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>
>>> 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
>>>> Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>>>> Validated that the 3 regressions reported for RC1 were fixed.
>>>> Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local mode, no regressions now.
>>>> Installed python version on virtualenv and run wordcount with success.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Hi everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>>>> 2.3.0, as
>>>> > follows:
>>>> >
>>>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>> includes:
>>>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>> dist.apache.org [2],
>>>> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>>>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>>>> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>>>> reference
>>>> > manual [6].
>>>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
>>>> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>>> > dist.apache.org [2].
>>>> >
>>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>> majority approval,
>>>> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > JB
>>>> >
>>>> > [1]
>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>>> projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>> > [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>> orgapachebeam-1027/
>>>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>>>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>>> > --
>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> > jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Eugene Kirpichov <ki...@google.com>.
Do we have a release validation spreadsheet for this one?
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples, streaming on Direct
> and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>
>> 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
>>> Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>>> Validated that the 3 regressions reported for RC1 were fixed.
>>> Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local mode, no regressions now.
>>> Installed python version on virtualenv and run wordcount with success.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>>> 2.3.0, as
>>> > follows:
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>>> [2],
>>> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>>> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>>> reference
>>> > manual [6].
>>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
>>> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>> > dist.apache.org [2].
>>> >
>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>>> approval,
>>> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > JB
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>> > [4]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
>>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>> > --
>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> > jbonofre@apache.org
>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>.
+1
I verified python quick start, mobile gaming examples, streaming on Direct
and Dataflow runners. Thank you JB!
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
> 2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
>> Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>> Validated that the 3 regressions reported for RC1 were fixed.
>> Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local mode, no regressions now.
>> Installed python version on virtualenv and run wordcount with success.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>> 2.3.0, as
>> > follows:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> >
>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>> [2],
>> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>> reference
>> > manual [6].
>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
>> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>> > dist.apache.org [2].
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>> approval,
>> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > JB
>> >
>> > [1]
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> ctId=12319527&version=12341608
>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> > [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> beam-1027/
>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>> > --
>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> > jbonofre@apache.org
>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding), thanks JB for the effort!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
2018-02-08 11:12 GMT+01:00 Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
> Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
> Validated that the 3 regressions reported for RC1 were fixed.
> Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local mode, no regressions now.
> Installed python version on virtualenv and run wordcount with success.
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> 2.3.0, as
> > follows:
> >
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> [2],
> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> reference
> > manual [6].
> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
> > dist.apache.org [2].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval,
> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > JB
> >
> > [1]
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachebeam-1027/
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbonofre@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
Validated that the 3 regressions reported for RC1 were fixed.
Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local mode, no regressions now.
Installed python version on virtualenv and run wordcount with success.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 2.3.0, as
> follows:
>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2],
> which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API reference
> manual [6].
> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
> dist.apache.org [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval,
> with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> JB
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi guys
Quick update for RC3: BEAM-3668 & BEAM-3519 have a PR in review (shading netty
in GCP IO).
Hopefully, the PR will be merge later today, then it will be cherry-pick on
release-2.3.0 branch.
As soon as it's done, I will cut a RC3 (hopefully tonight or tomorrow).
Regards
JB
On 02/10/2018 02:11 AM, Chamikara Jayalath wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4651 is in review.
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:38 PM Reuven Lax <relax@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Late to respond, but +1 to this decision.
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
> <ma...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> due to BEAM-3519 [1], I cancel RC2.
>
> We have to shade netty version in the IOs to avoid issue with netty
> version in
> runners (Spark in that case).
>
> We gonna work on a fix (I should be pretty fast), and I will cut a RC3 when
> cherry-pick on release-2.3.0 branch.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519
>
> On 02/08/2018 06:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> 2.3.0, as
> > follows:
> >
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> reference
> > manual [6].
> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
> > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval,
> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > JB
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>.
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4651 is in review.
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:38 PM Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> wrote:
> Late to respond, but +1 to this decision.
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> due to BEAM-3519 [1], I cancel RC2.
>>
>> We have to shade netty version in the IOs to avoid issue with netty
>> version in
>> runners (Spark in that case).
>>
>> We gonna work on a fix (I should be pretty fast), and I will cut a RC3
>> when
>> cherry-pick on release-2.3.0 branch.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519
>>
>> On 02/08/2018 06:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>> 2.3.0, as
>> > follows:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> >
>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>> [2],
>> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
>> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>> reference
>> > manual [6].
>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
>> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>> > dist.apache.org [2].
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>> approval,
>> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > JB
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> > [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Reuven Lax <re...@google.com>.
Late to respond, but +1 to this decision.
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> due to BEAM-3519 [1], I cancel RC2.
>
> We have to shade netty version in the IOs to avoid issue with netty
> version in
> runners (Spark in that case).
>
> We gonna work on a fix (I should be pretty fast), and I will cut a RC3 when
> cherry-pick on release-2.3.0 branch.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519
>
> On 02/08/2018 06:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> 2.3.0, as
> > follows:
> >
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> [2],
> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
> > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> reference
> > manual [6].
> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
> > dist.apache.org [2].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval,
> > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > JB
> >
> > [1]
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachebeam-1027/
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release 2.3.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi guys,
due to BEAM-3519 [1], I cancel RC2.
We have to shade netty version in the IOs to avoid issue with netty version in
runners (Spark in that case).
We gonna work on a fix (I should be pretty fast), and I will cut a RC3 when
cherry-pick on release-2.3.0 branch.
Regards
JB
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3519
On 02/08/2018 06:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 2.3.0, as
> follows:
>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2],
> which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC2" [5],
> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API reference
> manual [6].
> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
> dist.apache.org [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval,
> with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> JB
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1027/
> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC2
> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com