You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ranger.apache.org by Abhay Kulkarni <ak...@hortonworks.com> on 2016/01/07 01:07:56 UTC

Review Request 41967: Good coding practice: fix issues in updates from RANGER-794

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for ranger and Madhan Neethiraj.


Summary (updated)
-----------------

Good coding practice: fix issues in updates from RANGER-794


Bugs: RANGER-796
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-796


Repository: ranger


Description (updated)
-------

Good coding practice: fix issues in updates from RANGER-794 uncovered by static analysis


Diffs (updated)
-----

  agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/contextenricher/RangerFileBasedTagRetriever.java 95291be 
  agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/store/AbstractPredicateUtil.java 62b9bca 
  agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/PerfDataRecorder.java 72da8e8 
  ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/CommandLineParser.java a45d71a 
  ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/PerfTestClient.java b88d670 
  ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/PerfTestEngine.java 1b5f6fd 
  ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/RangerPolicyenginePerfTester.java 28cc558 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/diff/


Testing (updated)
-------

Ran ranger-engine test tool and checked that the results were as expected.


Thanks,

Abhay Kulkarni


Re: Review Request 41967: Good coding practice: fix issues in updates from RANGER-794

Posted by Madhan Neethiraj <ma...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/#review113162
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Madhan Neethiraj


On Jan. 7, 2016, 1:42 a.m., Abhay Kulkarni wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 7, 2016, 1:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger and Madhan Neethiraj.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-796
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-796
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Good coding practice: fix issues in updates from RANGER-794 uncovered by static analysis
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/contextenricher/RangerFileBasedTagRetriever.java 95291be 
>   agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/store/AbstractPredicateUtil.java 62b9bca 
>   agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/PerfDataRecorder.java 72da8e8 
>   ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/CommandLineParser.java a45d71a 
>   ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/PerfTestClient.java b88d670 
>   ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/PerfTestEngine.java 1b5f6fd 
>   ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/RangerPolicyenginePerfTester.java 28cc558 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran ranger-engine test tool and checked that the results were as expected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Abhay Kulkarni
> 
>


Re: Review Request 41967: Good coding practice: fix issues in updates from RANGER-794

Posted by Abhay Kulkarni <ak...@hortonworks.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Jan. 7, 2016, 1:42 a.m.)


Review request for ranger and Madhan Neethiraj.


Changes
-------

Addressed review comment.


Bugs: RANGER-796
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-796


Repository: ranger


Description
-------

Good coding practice: fix issues in updates from RANGER-794 uncovered by static analysis


Diffs (updated)
-----

  agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/contextenricher/RangerFileBasedTagRetriever.java 95291be 
  agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/store/AbstractPredicateUtil.java 62b9bca 
  agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/PerfDataRecorder.java 72da8e8 
  ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/CommandLineParser.java a45d71a 
  ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/PerfTestClient.java b88d670 
  ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/PerfTestEngine.java 1b5f6fd 
  ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/RangerPolicyenginePerfTester.java 28cc558 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/diff/


Testing
-------

Ran ranger-engine test tool and checked that the results were as expected.


Thanks,

Abhay Kulkarni


Re: Review Request 41967: Good coding practice: fix issues in updates from RANGER-794

Posted by Madhan Neethiraj <ma...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/#review113158
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/contextenricher/RangerFileBasedTagRetriever.java (line 105)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/#comment173658>

    Consider moving GsonBuilder() instantiation outside this if block - perhaps at the begining of the init().
    
    Also "serviceTagsFileURL != null" can be removed, as the code inside this block does not refer to serviceTagsFileURL.


- Madhan Neethiraj


On Jan. 7, 2016, 12:07 a.m., Abhay Kulkarni wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 7, 2016, 12:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger and Madhan Neethiraj.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-796
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-796
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Good coding practice: fix issues in updates from RANGER-794 uncovered by static analysis
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/contextenricher/RangerFileBasedTagRetriever.java 95291be 
>   agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/store/AbstractPredicateUtil.java 62b9bca 
>   agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/PerfDataRecorder.java 72da8e8 
>   ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/CommandLineParser.java a45d71a 
>   ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/PerfTestClient.java b88d670 
>   ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/PerfTestEngine.java 1b5f6fd 
>   ranger-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/policyengine/RangerPolicyenginePerfTester.java 28cc558 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41967/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran ranger-engine test tool and checked that the results were as expected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Abhay Kulkarni
> 
>