You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> on 2006/04/17 16:13:05 UTC
Tomahawk Release?
Are we ready for a branch for Tomahawk? Earlier it was pointed out
that there were some impl dependencies still in Sandbox. Matthias
removed some of these and I think its safe to ignore the rest for now
since they are in sandbox. I don't think we want to go too long
without an updated tomahawk now that the old one is incompatible with
the new core.
Sean
Re: Tomahawk Release?
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmx.at>.
Sean Schofield schrieb:
> Are we ready for a branch for Tomahawk? Earlier it was pointed out
> that there were some impl dependencies still in Sandbox. Matthias
> removed some of these and I think its safe to ignore the rest for now
> since they are in sandbox. I don't think we want to go too long
> without an updated tomahawk now that the old one is incompatible with
> the new core.
>
Actually to my knowledge all dependencies in the sandbox are gone now.
at least they were yesterday.
Re: Tomahawk Release?
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
Try searching for "tomahawk/src/test has dependencies on MyFaces Impl"
from Mar 17 to Mar 20.
On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we get rid ot the impl dependencies in the tests? I haven't
> looked closely but I don't like the idea of depending on the impl for
> anything. I removed the depedency from the poms on my local checkout
> and maven won't compile.
>
> Sean
>
> On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I created shared and tomahawk branches. We need to upgrade the
> > SNAPSHOT versions on the trunk by 1 minor revision number. We also
> > need to fix a bunch of dependencies on the trunk that go along with
> > that.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 4/17/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Are we ready for a branch for Tomahawk? Earlier it was pointed out
> > > > that there were some impl dependencies still in Sandbox. Matthias
> > > > removed some of these and I think its safe to ignore the rest for now
> > > > since they are in sandbox.
> > >
> > > Actually, Matthias took the time to go through and fix every single
> > > remaining dependency issue! Thanks!
> > >
> > > Let's release Tomahawk to reduce user confusion. After that, we can
> > > release as desired, including minor bug fixes.
> > >
> >
>
Re: Tomahawk Release?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Can we get rid ot the impl dependencies in the tests? I haven't
looked closely but I don't like the idea of depending on the impl for
anything. I removed the depedency from the poms on my local checkout
and maven won't compile.
Sean
On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I created shared and tomahawk branches. We need to upgrade the
> SNAPSHOT versions on the trunk by 1 minor revision number. We also
> need to fix a bunch of dependencies on the trunk that go along with
> that.
>
> Sean
>
> On 4/17/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Are we ready for a branch for Tomahawk? Earlier it was pointed out
> > > that there were some impl dependencies still in Sandbox. Matthias
> > > removed some of these and I think its safe to ignore the rest for now
> > > since they are in sandbox.
> >
> > Actually, Matthias took the time to go through and fix every single
> > remaining dependency issue! Thanks!
> >
> > Let's release Tomahawk to reduce user confusion. After that, we can
> > release as desired, including minor bug fixes.
> >
>
Re: Tomahawk Release?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
I created shared and tomahawk branches. We need to upgrade the
SNAPSHOT versions on the trunk by 1 minor revision number. We also
need to fix a bunch of dependencies on the trunk that go along with
that.
Sean
On 4/17/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are we ready for a branch for Tomahawk? Earlier it was pointed out
> > that there were some impl dependencies still in Sandbox. Matthias
> > removed some of these and I think its safe to ignore the rest for now
> > since they are in sandbox.
>
> Actually, Matthias took the time to go through and fix every single
> remaining dependency issue! Thanks!
>
> Let's release Tomahawk to reduce user confusion. After that, we can
> release as desired, including minor bug fixes.
>
Re: Tomahawk Release?
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
On 4/17/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are we ready for a branch for Tomahawk? Earlier it was pointed out
> that there were some impl dependencies still in Sandbox. Matthias
> removed some of these and I think its safe to ignore the rest for now
> since they are in sandbox.
Actually, Matthias took the time to go through and fix every single
remaining dependency issue! Thanks!
Let's release Tomahawk to reduce user confusion. After that, we can
release as desired, including minor bug fixes.