You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@falcon.apache.org by Samarth Gupta <sa...@gmail.com> on 2014/11/03 12:28:02 UTC
Re: falcon-regression
+1 for this.
it will also be beneficial if we are able to add similar testNG groups at
test level also. That will give more control to the person running
regression and interested in testing on particular feature or exclude some
particular group.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Paul Isaychuk <pi...@hortonworks.com>
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Our team discussed an idea of tests reorganization.
> The idea is to split up and sort all of tests between packages below:
>
> - remotefs (azure, s3 tests)
> - hcat
> - security (acl, authorization etc.)
> - ui
> - entity (all entity-oriented tests)
> - instance (all instance-oriented tests)
> - features (all tests which relate to things like replication,
> retention, retry etc.)
> - lineage
> - prism (we can left distributed mode specific tests here)
>
> Any comments on that?
>
> --
>
> Paul Isaychuk
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
Re: falcon-regression
Posted by Seetharam Venkatesh <ve...@innerzeal.com>.
I have a minor suggestion:
features can be broken down to:
* lifecycle
* lifecycle/replication
* lifecycle/retention
etc.
Lineage is under metadata
metadata/lineage
metadata/discovery
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Raghav Kumar Gautam <raghavgautam@gmail.com
> wrote:
> +1 for the test reorganization.
>
> I am also in favor of TestNG grouping. We can keep these as separate tasks.
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Samarth Gupta <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for this.
> >
> > it will also be beneficial if we are able to add similar testNG groups at
> > test level also. That will give more control to the person running
> > regression and interested in testing on particular feature or exclude
> some
> > particular group.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Paul Isaychuk <
> pisaychuk@hortonworks.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > Our team discussed an idea of tests reorganization.
> > > The idea is to split up and sort all of tests between packages below:
> > >
> > > - remotefs (azure, s3 tests)
> > > - hcat
> > > - security (acl, authorization etc.)
> > > - ui
> > > - entity (all entity-oriented tests)
> > > - instance (all instance-oriented tests)
> > > - features (all tests which relate to things like replication,
> > > retention, retry etc.)
> > > - lineage
> > > - prism (we can left distributed mode specific tests here)
> > >
> > > Any comments on that?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Paul Isaychuk
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> >
>
--
Regards,
Venkatesh
“Perfection (in design) is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.”
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Re: falcon-regression
Posted by Raghav Kumar Gautam <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the test reorganization.
I am also in favor of TestNG grouping. We can keep these as separate tasks.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Samarth Gupta <sa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for this.
>
> it will also be beneficial if we are able to add similar testNG groups at
> test level also. That will give more control to the person running
> regression and interested in testing on particular feature or exclude some
> particular group.
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Paul Isaychuk <pi...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > Our team discussed an idea of tests reorganization.
> > The idea is to split up and sort all of tests between packages below:
> >
> > - remotefs (azure, s3 tests)
> > - hcat
> > - security (acl, authorization etc.)
> > - ui
> > - entity (all entity-oriented tests)
> > - instance (all instance-oriented tests)
> > - features (all tests which relate to things like replication,
> > retention, retry etc.)
> > - lineage
> > - prism (we can left distributed mode specific tests here)
> >
> > Any comments on that?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Paul Isaychuk
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>